At the
Kent
headquarters of The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
Local 46, workers meet the first Thursday of every month to discuss the
problems racial minorities and women face in the electrical industry. Men
and women, black, Asian, Hispanic and white of all ages and each a member
of IBEW Local 46, plan ways to strengthen and diversify the union so that
it represents the complexion of the community, and to achieve equality
with the union local’s white male majority in employment rates and union
leadership. The purpose of this essay is to map out the history and
political context of Local 46’s Electrical Workers Minority Caucus (EWMC)
- to tell the story of specially oppressed workers, their union, and the
advanced political leadership role they play.
Background
Local 46’s EWMC is
part of a massive electrical industry labor force represented by the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, an organization
representing and defending approximately 750,000
union electrical workers across the
United States
,
Canada, and
Puerto Rico
. Each region in which the IBEW now operates is
designated with a local number. IBEW Local 46 includes all organized
construction electricians in King, Kitsap, Jefferson and
Clallam
Counties
.
The
history of IBEW Local 46, and the region’s labor movement in general, is
complicated, with elements of reaction and racism at one extreme and
inclusiveness and revolutionary ideals at the other. For instance, the
Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) focused much of its energy on the
Northwest. These revolutionary syndicalists
stood for the organization of all workers into one big union, regardless
of race, gender or origin. The IWW fought for a better life for all
working people. Their influence has been wide and lasting. Today the IBEW
Local 46 website includes passages on the IWW, their
history and tactics, even though Local 46’s craft unionism stands in
marked contrast to the industrial unionism advocated by the Wobblies. And
if
Seattle
electrical workers were to walk off a job right now in protest of bad
working conditions, the action would be referred to as a “wobble.”
Unfortunately, at least as influential as radicalism has been the legacy
of racism inside the American Federation of Labor (AFL), an organization
that is supposed to protect and improve worker’s situations. The AFL’s
precursor in Seattle, the Knights of Labor, formed in the aftermath of an
anti-Chinese riot in 1886 which drove most of the city’s Asian
population out of the city.[1]
The IBEW is an AFL craft union where members are organized based on their
skill instead of their belonging to an industry. An industrial union of
the construction industry, which does not exist in this country, would
include carpenters, iron workers, electricians, pipe-fitters, material
handlers, truck drivers and even non-management office workers. Under the
craft union system, the different trades in an industry are divided by job
description rather than workplace. In
this environment, nepotism dominates as the vehicle for trade recruitment,
and typically reinforces racial and gender exclusion.
IBEW Local 46 is often referred to inside
Seattle
’s construction industry as an “FBI” union, indicating a
relationship of “father, brother or in-law” is useful in attaining
membership. These nepotistic ties are not limited to members inside the
union, but across the industry. For instance, Rick Zenner, once the
president of Local 46’s Wiremen’s Unit, is now a superintendent at
McKinstry’s electrical division, and more than one of his children
currently serve apprenticeships. Owners of electrical contracting
companies are often able to introduce their family members into the union
as electricians, creating personal links between workers and owners that
obscure the issue of class and weaken the union’s ability to advance the
quality of life of its members. This closed system of recruitment, coupled
with the desirability of these high wage jobs, has led to the formation of
minority groups over the years whose goal has been to integrate the
construction industry. This is the legacy of the EWMC.
Race and Gender in the Northwest Working
Class
The EWMC always has been and will probably continue to be a largely black
organization. Membership is open to anyone belonging to Local 46 and is
actively encouraged, but despite their small numbers, black people have
always played a disproportionately strong political role the labor
movement, from fighting slavery through the Civil War and Reconstruction,
to the rise of the CIO and in groups like the EWMC in the modern labor
movement. This is a function of American history.
While not subjected to the
particularly vicious oppression that black men experience in everyday
life, and not a minority of the population, white women have been
historically discriminated against in the electrical industry in patterns
that parallel other oppressed groups. Women electricians are stereotyped
in ludicrous ways. Male electricians of a variety of political persuasions
routinely state that women only join the trade to find a husband. In fact,
women have sought entry into the trades for the same reasons as all
workers- high wages and good benefits. Janet Lewis the first white woman
to join Local 46 as an electrical apprentice remembers her early
experiences fighting for equal training:
“In 1974 we were doing a lot of high-rises and you could get
pigeon-holed doing nothing but lighting for a year and on top of that you
were the last hired and first fired…It was hard because at a certain
point it wasn’t the contractor who was out to get you or your union, but
your actual brothers, the people you worked with hated you.”[2]
Women also deal with stereotypes that on the surface seem true. When a
worker has black skin, it is their skin that is different, where as a
woman electrician can appear to be physically inferior to a male
electrician based on her size, build and strength. In fact tools do most
of the actual work an electrician produces, especially power tools which
are required to be provided by the contractor by contract.[3]
Electrical construction does put physical demands on a worker, but it
should be the worker’s decision whether or not they choose to be in a
difficult trade. The mission statement of the IBEW declares its purpose to
pursue an ever increasing quality of life for the membership. Regardless
of gender, the idea is not to overwork oneself.
Black women in the trades experience double discrimination as well as the
isolation of not feeling completely represented by political groups
dominated by black men or white women. Beverly Sims, one of the first
black people in Local 46 and first women to complete Local 46’s
electrical apprenticeship notes that while white women did organize to
defend themselves when they first got into the trade, “They were really
clandestine. It wasn’t about saying ‘We have a right to be here!’
They never waged any campaigns. It was more of a support group.” And,
“Black Men were sexist too. I’m not going to lie. All men are sexist.
They have to be to live in this society.”[4]
The path into IBEW Local 46 for black men was different than for women and
most other racial minorities. By 1969, of the 2,700 members of the local
only two were non-white. The glaringly white presence of the
non-integrated electricians working on construction sites in the central
district, like Medgar Evers Pool, provoked a demonstration by the Central
Contractors Association (CCA)- an organization of black and Hispanic
contractors.[5]
Black male trades people, who were barred by the union leadership from
joining
Seattle
’s trade unions, instead worked as small non-union contractors. The
economic opportunity and working conditions experienced by these
“contractors” was worse than that of a union construction worker and
should not be confused with the position of white construction company
owners. Rather, the goal of CCA demonstrations was to gain entry into the
unions and attain positions as workers on union job sites. The CCA
employed militant tactics, such as occupations, to shut down job sites and
was successful in spite of continuing hostility from the unions.
Demonstrations were held by the CCA at construction sites across the city,
especially at government buildings being erected with tax dollars like the
University
of
Washington,
Seattle
Central
Community College
and
Seatac
Airport
.[6]
In 1969 these demonstrating workers broke the color bar. The court order
of The U.S. Department of Justice vs. Ironworkers Local 86, introduced
legal language dictating to the building trade’s unions that they would
integrate. The United Construction Workers Association (UCWA) was one
group of black worker-activists authorized by the courts to oversee the
execution of the order in industry. For workers in the Local 46 EWMC,
Tyree Scott, the leader of the UCWA, himself an electrician who would join
Local 46, is a legend. All the early black members of Local 46 came into
the union either directly from these struggles or as a result of the
affirmative action legislation that they led to. While not
particularly active in the EWMC today, a few Local 46 members who
were members of the UCWA’s Electrical Worker’s Caucus do hold
political positions in the local today, a testament to their success.[7]
Today Filipino workers comprise one of the larger minority groups inside
Local 46. The Filipino
community in
Seattle
is largely working class, with strong family and community ties.
Individual workers who got in through affirmative action in the seventies
and eighties often brought their relatives in too. Marine electricians,
who maintain boats for the Washington State Ferries and work in shipyards
such as Todd’s, are often Filipino. The history of working in the
fishing and canning industries, with their links to the maritime
industries, is perhaps related to the large presence in the Marine Unit of
Local 46 today.
The first women to join Local 46’s apprenticeship did so under the court
order that mandated the integration of blacks into the union. Cybil Brown
who entered the apprenticeship in the 1970s will soon be the first female
to retire from Local 46 with full benefits (which requires 30,000 hours of
construction work). The year 1979, about ten years after the CCA
demonstrations, nine women started apprenticeships. While minority male
workers were often able to be organized in as journeymen, women mostly
lacked prior construction experience and had to come in as apprentices.
Still, women have been able to progress up the industry ladder better than
non-white males. Cooperation and division between these two oppressed
groups will factor into the political life of both groups continually.[8]
The EWMC: Origins, campaigns and goals
The
legacy of Tyree Scott and the UCWA lived on in Local 46 after the early
seventies in the political work of black electricians. While not part of
an official Local caucus like the EWMC, black electrical workers were
organized and did meet and communicate on what situations they were
encountering. The UCWA and later Labor Equality Law Office (LELO)
facilitated the organization these workers. Because of their reputation
for activism and the confrontational way they got into the union, these
first black workers were often blacklisted by electrical contractors and
found themselves working in maintenance for government agencies that hire
out of Local 46 or traveling to other locals in search of work. Tyree
Scott for instance, found a place where he could work as an electrician
and stay political at the
Port
of
Seattle
. Others such as current Business Representative Elwood Evans, pursued
political careers inside the IBEW. It was important to get into a place
where they would be insulated from some of the virulent racism that was
still the industry norm.[9]
While minorities in Local 46 fought to get in the
industry, nationally a group was forming to address the absence of
minority representation in the IBEW’s International Office (IO). In 1974, a delegation of Black and Hispanic IBEW members from
around the country came to the IBEW national convention in
Kansas City
. The delegation’s primary objective was to get an interview with
International President Charles Pallard to address the lack of minorities
in leadership positions of the IO. This union of nearly 1,000,000 had only
one person of color on the international staff. During the confrontation,
Pallard and the other white delegates expressed hesitation at the
delegate’s demands. Minorities were subsequently appointed to IO
positions under that administration.[10]
After the first
formal national EWMC conference in 1986, where the EWMC met and named
itself, there was an IO mandate that each other IBEW Local should form an
EWMC. Since 1991, the EWMC has met annually and Robbie Sparks, an original
member present in the 1974 delegation, has been president. The national
EWMC now holds its national conference on MLK weekend each year.
IBEW locals around the
country rapidly chartered EWMC chapters, especially in large cities with
substantial black populations.
Seattle
hesitated, suggesting an unusual racism inside the local.
Portland
, which organized an EWMC chapter earlier, had a black business manager
who “got along with everyone [and] didn’t mention race too much.”[11]
who helped make the
Portland
local more liberal.
Subjected to racism,
black workers often find problems staying adequately employed in their
home local during hard times and are forced to travel to other cities to
find work. In 1994, work in
Seattle
was slow. According to Fred Simmons, he, Ian White and Ron Rouzan, three
black journeymen electricians, traveled down to IBEW Local 48 in
Portland
to find work constructing the new microchip plants. White, who liked to
get to know people, connected with Rick Peron in
Portland
and they started talking about
Portland
’s EWMC. At the next Portland EWMC meeting, about 15 people and the
three Local 46ers attended. It was refreshing for Local 46 members to see
how organized these minority workers were.[12]
Ron Rouzan remembers
Portland
’s EWMC helping them get comfortable and connected in what might have
otherwise been a daunting situation. For example, White had not had a lot
of opportunity to work with large pipe doing complicated bends, the
organized minority workers in
Portland
made sure he got work with a crew where he would get the opportunity to
learn that skill. White, Simmons and Rouzan wondered if they were
organized enough to extend the same helping hand to minority workers who
would travel to
Seattle
in the future. They returned home in the spring of 1995 ready to set up a
Local 46 EWMC.[13]
Fred Simmons was the first president of the Local 46 EWMC. The rest of the
cabinet consisted of Ron Rouzan as vice president, Tony Elliot (a female
journeyman) as treasurer and Sandra Moore-Jones as secretary. Daryl Prevo
(current EWMC President) organized to get a charter from the national EWMC
and started a dues assessment of $20 a week so they could put away money
for a legal fund. The first meeting attracted forty members. While most
new members were black, white women and other minorities also joined. Even
white males would occasionally join. White EWMC member Doug Johnson
describes his interest in the organization as such, “If [the local] was
all white boys we’d just eat each other up…Instead of a fifteen minute
break you’d start taking a seven minute break, which would turn into a
five minute one, then no break at all. Then you start bringing in your own
tools to keep that job. That’s what the white boys would do. The
minorities keep everything in check. The women also. They’re the ones
who push for equal rights, better conditions, they’re the ones who
struggle for the union worker.”
The
Local 46 EWMC got a lot of support initially from the city-wide minority
worker’s movement. The Breakfast Club, a thirty-five year old club of
black pipe-fitters and plumbers, who meet for breakfast at Skyway Bowl to
discuss their union issues, also came to the first few meetings to talk
about what issues to address and how. Tyree Scott, helped with advice and
tactics too. He was instrumental in getting the caucus going on its first
successful campaign.
This
campaign happened in April of 1998 at the Safeco Stadium construction
site. It was a big job and an outside agency had been hired to monitor
progress of the project and engage in community outreach, including
enforcement of minority employment goals. White had been monitoring the
apprenticeship and realized that the Safeco project had been skirting the
laws by merely advertising the project’s availability to minorities
without actually recruiting minorities. The caucus sent a delegation to a
public meeting and called the situation out, the meeting was rapidly
adjourned. Amidst these problems, a situation developed where racist iron
workers, who had traveled to
Seattle
from the south with The Erection Company to work at Safeco, began dropping
pieces of steel from the ceiling when one of the women or racial
minorities working there walked underneath. They were trying to send a
message to minorities. That message was also seen in the restrooms in the
form of racist vandalism. The hang-man’s noose began to appear on the
jobsite as a threat to those who’s demographics put them outside the
white-male, Christian majority.[14]
As
outrage towards the situation built, a walkout was organized by The Labor
Employment Law Office (LELO), the Seattle EWMC and other labor
organizations, with Scott, Simmons and current LELO leader Mike Woo, a
pipe-fitter. A Project Labor Agreement governing the job specifically
forbade work stoppages of any kind. According to Fred Simmons, Local
46’s leadership gave the walk out no support because work stoppages
weren’t sanctioned. Organizers of the walk out had to meet together off
site to plan the event. Word got around and what was supposed to be a
small meeting attracted nearly a hundred workers. When it was time to
walk, LELO contacted the media and everyone one stopped production,
including the Local 86 Seattle Iron Workers. Only the
Alabama
racists stayed behind. The rally shut down the biggest construction site
in the local for a day and when it was over, so were the racist attacks.
[15]
Tyree
Scott wrote of the rally’s organizational process: “…a group of
concerned stadium workers met at a diner a few blocks away from their job
site to talk about the dangers they were facing and how to best resolve
it…One young black worker said, ‘this is clearly a black/white
issue…’ An older black worker disagreed and made an argument for the
white stadium workers who were offended by the action of this group.
‘The vast majority of white workers, also, are opposed to what’s been
going on,’ he argued. Respecting the view of the older worker and his
allies, the younger worker asked, ‘What then is the issue?’ Another
worker explained that while the attacks were most often directed at women
and people of color, the real danger was that they constituted an unsafe
work environment. He said that all workers felt threatened by the climate
on their job. ‘Safety,’ he said, ‘that is the real issue.’”[16]
As
this early exampled showed, the work of the EWMC helps improve conditions
for
all IBEW members, not just minorities. Caucus members are leaders in Local
46 participating in caucus membership in addition to their local political
activity. They attend union meetings at a higher rate than average and in
local meetings often represent the most forward looking currents. As its
mission statement declares, one of the objective of the EWMC is to promote
equal opportunity and employment for minorities at all levels of the IBEW
structure and provide education and training for its members. The main
vehicle to bring in minorities and educate them is the apprenticeship. The
work of minorities in reforming apprenticeship admission requirements has
opened up the Local for easier access to all interested applicants,
fighting nepotism which affects everyone
.
Nancy
Mason, one of the women who joined the electrical apprenticeship in 1979,
used affirmative action opportunities to rapidly climb the industry ladder
and become the apprenticeship training director. Under her leadership, by
1991 the apprenticeship had surpassed the state quota of 22 percent
minorities to reach a height of 27 percent. Her efforts to get the
apprenticeship to that point included changing the policy of accepting
applications for only two weeks every two years, to accepting applications
all the time and actively recruiting in minority communities.[17]
Mason is now the Labor and Industries’ head of apprentice training for
all trades.
Recruitment has been a historically crucial element of Local 46’s EWMC
activity. By working with the apprenticeship committee at the time of the
Safeco campaigns, the EWMC was able to get the funding to set up
application tables at community events and print advertisements in
community newspapers.[18]
This type of recruitment also reaches potential white applicants who live
in integrated communities and would normally be isolated from this kind of
opportunity because they don’t know anyone in the union. Much remains to
be done by the EWMC in terms of recruiting. Other trades such as the
pipe-fitters have successfully fought their apprenticeship application
procedures and remove various subjective factors from the process such as
academic tests and panel interviews. When Simmons applied to the
apprenticeship program, his interview was conducted by
two white guys “drunk as hell” and luckily in a good mood. They told
him that the difference between this and any other job is that as a union
construction worker you can “tell someone to kiss your ass” and get a
new job the next day. While not an example of racism, this story
illustrates the pointless nature of the procedure.[19]
One early recruiting problem brought to light a situation where minorities
were pitted against each other in competition for positions. Mandates to
fill foreman and apprenticeship positions with a minority worker were
disproportionately going to white women. In the most offensive cases,
wives, sisters and daughters of powerful local members were brought in
while blacks were iced out. But more subtly, women were simply promoted
above black and other minority workers because the white male higher-ups
felt more comfortable working with a perceived inferior of their own race,
than a competitive minority male who would want to promote and retain more
minority males at the company.[20]
When dealing in race, class and gender, nothing is simple and a lot of
attention is needed to maintain alliances and equality.
While membership and activity rates of the EWMC have ebbed and flowed over
the years, the caucus has maintained itself as a factor in the political
direction of Local 46. Many different political currents operate together
within the caucus. That is the nature of an organization united by
anti-racism, anti-sexism and open to everything else. Keeping lines of
communication open and treating differences as a fact that will always
need attention helps keep the caucus together and in the end fosters a
more sophisticated political program. A strength of the EWMC is that it
teaches politically active individuals how to struggle without becoming
demoralized.
Labor organizations do not operate in a vacuum; they are driven by the
need of their historical situation. At the beginning of a colossal
construction boom in
Seattle
in 1995, a sense of job security emboldened minority workers to renew
their fight for equality and a higher standard of living. Things may
appear stagnant today compared to EWMC history. At the start of 2005
nearly one third of Local 46 electricians are out of work. Members who
have worked in this local their entire careers have never seen things
worse. But go to an IBEW Local 46 union meeting and the EWMC will still be
at the microphone advocating for union strength, keeping the local on the
right track and fulfilling its role as the most politically advanced voice
of
Seattle
’s electrical trade.
(c) Nicole Grant
HSTAA 353 Spring 2005
[1]
Quintard Taylor, The Forging of
a Black Community: Seattle’s Central District from 1870 through the
Civil Rights Era (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1994),
112
[2]
Janet Lewis, Interviewed by Nicole Grant,
August 17, 2005
[3]
Labor Agreement Between Local Union No.46 IBEW and Puget Sound NECA,
June 21, 2004
, pg. 24 (available through Local 46, Kent, WA)
[4]
Beverly Simms, Interviewed by Nicole Grant, May 25, 2005
[7]
UCWA Meeting Minutes,
University
of
Washington
Library: Special Collections Tyree Scott Papers, 1976
[8]
Susan Eisenberg, We’ll Call
You If We Need You: Experiences of Women Working Construction, (Ithica:
Cornell Press,1998), 181
[9]
Ron Rouzan, Interviewed by Nicole Grant
May 23, 2005
[10]
Russle Ponder, Interviewed by Nicole Grant
April 25, 2005
[11]
Fred Simmons, Interviewed by Nicole Grant
April 22, 2005
[12]
Ian White, Interviewed by Nicole Grant
May 14, 2005
[13]
Rouzan,
May 23, 2005
[14]
Rouzan,
May 23, 2005
[15]
Michael Woo, Interviewed by
Nicole Grant
August 17, 2005
[16]
Speaking for Themselves to Each Other, Tyree Scott, (Seattle: LELO
document, 1998)
[17]
Susan Eisenberg, We’ll Call
You If We Need You, 1998, pg. 182
[18]
Rouzan,
May 23, 2005
[19]
Simmons,
April 22, 2005
[20]
Rouzan,
May 23, 2005