|
Page
Contents
What
Is Population Health?
Income Inequality and Population Health
Structure of Society & Health
Policy Implications
What Is the Problem?
Criticisms of These
Ideas
Join
our Listserv
TO SUBSCRIBE to the Forum's list, click this LINK
and follow the instructions and options for subscribing as well
as access to the email archives.
"We live in a society that favors
medical technology over public health.
We'd rather pay for the 'pound of cure' than the 'ounce of prevention.'
Unfortunately, giving people a new heart is much more glamorous (and
expensive, too)
than teaching them to take care of the heart
they were born with."
— Michael Barnes,
health-care economist
Send
us your comments, questions, and written contributions |
Issues
What Is Population Health?
Population health refers to the
most important determinents of the health of populations.
We can measure population health by:
- Life expectancy
- Infant mortality
- Death rates
- Disability
- Quality of life
- Self-assessed health
- Happiness and well-being
What are the most important factors affecting the
health of a population? The factors that have the strongest effect
on health are, generally, rooted in the society's economic and social
relationships. in other words, health care and individual behaviors
seem to be less important than societal factors.
In studies conducted in the US and other countries, the level
of hierarchy in a society appears to be one of the most important
factors affecting the health of a population.
The greater the difference—or gap—between those on
top and those on the bottom in a society, the worse its health appears
to be.
In the US—where we buy most of the things we need—we
can use income distribution as measure of the gap between the richest
and poorest.
Income inequality
and population health
Populations whose income is below a threshold (about $5,000 - $10,000
in US per capita income) generally have poorer health. Increasing
income in such societies leads to better health. Above the threshold,
national health is not necessarily related to absolute income, but
rather to the gap between rich and poor. Studies in the past 15
years found that where income gaps are smaller, health appears to
be better.
Back to top
Hierarchy refers to ranking by political, economic, and
social status. For example, we can think of hierarchy as a ladder.
Where we place ourselves on the ladder is one measure of our status.
We might consider gender, race, income level, education, successes,
occupation, and health when we decide where we fit on the ladder.
Some other considerations might be:
- Social capital/social cohesion. Do people participate
in their community, trust others or cooperate for mutual benefit?
Cohesive communities are usually healthier.
- Psychosocial relationships. Do people form friendships
and care or share with one another? Relationships appear to be
important components of a population's health.
- Basic needs. Healthy communities have adequate food,
clean water, shelter, and a safe environment.
- Poverty. Poverty is a social status. Poverty is not
about possessions, but about relations between people. Pockets
of poverty have poorer health than the surrounding community.
- Egalitarianism. Egalitarian societies— with a
narrow gap between social groups—have greater health and
well being than societies with a rigid, extreme hierarchy.
Back to top
Societies with smaller extremes of hierarchy appear to care for
their physical environment better, and may also have better population
health.
In 2000, more than 4.7 million children under the age of five died
from illnesses aggravated by unhealthy environments, according to
the World Health Organization (WHO). Every two hours as many children
die as the total toll of the September 11 attacks. WHO has developed
a children's action plan called "Healthy Places, Happy Faces."
UNICEF,
Children in the New Millennium: Environmental Impact on Health
World
Health Organization, Healthy Environments for Children: An Alliance
to Shape the Future of Life
Criminologists and sociologists have known for decades that levels
of hierarchy predict the amount of violence in a population. The
bigger the gap, the more those above supress those below, often
with violence.
Structural violence refers to the excess rates of poor
health and death due to poverty. They are structural because
they are caused by the social and economic structures of society—decisions
made about who gets what. They are violent because they are
injuries to people caused by humans. This perspective suggests that
one of the leading causes of death in the world is structural violence.
Back to top
Groups of populations can be ranked by various health indicators,
such as life expectancy, infant mortality, and self-assessed health.
Rankings can also be made for other measures including education,
behaviors, and economic outcomes. Those rankings can provide insight
into population health. Some of these rankings are described below,
using the Olympics as a metaphor.
This concept has been used by the Population Health Forum at the
University of Washington to rank countries by life expectancy (using
annual United Nations data). As the chart below indicates (Click
to see larger version), the US is not winning any medals in
the Health Olympics.
Top30_t.gif)
(from UNDP Human Development
Report)
Click a chart
to see an enlarged version. |
Teen
Birth Olympics

Innocenti Report Card No. 3, July 2003.
|
Education
Olympics

Innocenti Report Card No. 4, November 2002.
|
Child Poverty
Olympics

Innocenti Report Card No. 6, 2005.
|
Child Abuse
Deaths

A league table of child maltreatment deaths
in rich nations, Innocenti Report Card No. 5, September 2003.
|
| Child
Injury Deaths

Innocenti Report Card No.2, February 2001. |
The Child Injury Deaths table shows the annual number of deaths
from maltreatment among children under the age of 15 years
averaged over a five year period and expressed per 100,000
children in the age group. Data are for the most recent five
year period during the 1990s for which information is available
for each country.
|
| These charts are all
from the Innocenti Report Cards, UNICEF. Innocenti
Research Centre, Florence. |
Back to top
Social cohesion refers to the extent of solidarity among
groups in a society and suggests there is mutual moral support.
A cohesive society has stocks of social capital.
The term social capital has been used since 1988. In
general, it refers to social (not individual) and public goods,
or those features of social structures that facilitate the actions
of members within them. We can think of social capital as levels
of trust within a social structure, social organizations, norms,
sanctions, and information channels. Levels of trust in communities
have been linked to hierarchy by Eric Uslaner and to mortality rates
by Ichiro Kawachi.
Given that the structure of society—the rules governing who
gets what share of the resources—has such a profound connection
to the health of individuals and groups within that society, these
concepts have strong policy implications. In general, we can ask
what effects a particular policy, such as cutting taxes on a certain
segment of society or subsidizing some industry, will have on the
hierarchy in that society and, therefore, on its health considered
specifically in terms of mortality rates, and more broadly, in terms
of various behaviors and outcomes.
Back to top
What Is
the Problem?
Almost all trends today in societies in many parts of the world,
are increasing the disparity between the rich and the poor. The
health implications are serious. Some populations in the world have
life expectancies little different from Ancient Rome; others have
unimaginably good health, despite having few resources or advanced
medical care. It is difficult to call this progress. Yet many of
us who are privileged and some of us who are not, remain profoundly
ignorant of this situation.
Criticisms
of the Hierarchy & Poor Health Relationship
We can learn a great deal by understanding critical comments on
the hiearchy/poor health relationship. Academic criticisms in the
scholarly literature are addressed in the academic bibliography
on the Resources page. Some of the few criticisms in the popular
press are presented below.
Does Inequality
Make You Sick? The dangers of the new public health crusade.
The Weekly Standard, July 16, 2001
also available at The
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
"Is Our Society Making You
Sick ? a "My Turn" editorial that appeared in NEWSWEEK.
A commentary
on the Newsweek article.
Back to top |