Most of my family lives far away so when we need to see them we have to take a plane. Though recently we couldn't because of the war, a couple years back my family went to Ukraine via plane. The flight was very long and probably left a big carbon footprint.

This is wise to notice, and we should not take flights when it is not necessary (Like when we can drive somewhere but the flight saves time)

I took flights kinda often this year for example going to LA, Cabo, Mexico, Washington, and D.C wich most of them weren't to far from California. I think I could reduce my carbon footprint by trying to limit the flights I take to places near me and this would also help the enviorment more.

I think it's better to travel by plane than car because, if you're traveling far your going to be using a lot of gas in a car and you'd be driving for hours, but in a plane you can travel faster and not leave as much carbon footprint.

I agree

I do agree that it is a lot easier and more convenient with how far your traveling. all though I do think that people should consider driving a lot more to places in driving range. for example where I live in Canada, you can maybe drive to the U.S if your going their, especially because it is in driving range. and also the idea that flying gives a lot towards your carbon footprint.