Enter your username and password below

Not registered yet?   Forgotten your password?

Food & Hunger

What did you learn about dietary choices from using the footprint calculator? Now imagine that you could translate what you learned into an effective societal policy on food- what would it be? And how would this policy effect the need to alleviate world hunger?

925 million people on earth do not have enough to eat according to the FAO [Food and Agricultural Organization]. That's almost 1 in 7 inhabitants of our planet!




Food & Hunger >

If Possible, Don’t Eat Beef

AustinT

In the Environmental Science Academy, students discuss potential solutions to our environmental problems. One major consequence is eating beef. Most people associate drastic climate change with transportation and home necessities. However, raising cattle has a larger role in Earth’s recent environmental setbacks. People should consider finding alternatives to beef because the carbon footprint for beef is severely larger than other meats (chicken and fish). In the meantime, the media should begin emphasizing the consequences of eating beef.

hodin

I agree with you Austin,. it is one of the main reasons that I became “mostly vegan” 10 years ago
But perhaps the best way to start would be to advocate that people eat less meat and go from there?

Summer-Skye

But beef has proteins in it which is good for you plus hamburgers are good. I do agree though

edenc

Plenty of other foods have protein, such as beans, lentils, and tofu. I know plenty of vegetarians who get enough protein and live very healthy lives.

I find myself eating very little meat, and I've cut out pork from my diet for 9 years now. Austin, does eating pork also have a severe effect on the environment?

Summer-Skye

Technically I think anything can effect the environment good or baf

kimberlyj

I found this really interesting, because I have never thought about how raising cattle could be bad for the environment. After reading this, I decided to do some research and found this website: http://timeforchange.org/are-cows-cause … ethane-CO2 Here it explains that the amount of methane gas released by cows is contributing to global warming. According to this website, methane being released into the air is even worse than releasing carbon dioxide into the air. I agree that the media should emphasize the consequences of eating beef more because it's affecting global warming much more than most people think.

alexkcov

According to Time's Article, [Meat: Making Global Warming Worse](http://content.time.com/time/health/art … 95,00.html), 18% of green house emissions are from the livestock industry, which is 5% more than the emissions created by cars, trains, and other forms of transportation. The need for more meat, as the population grows, will arise, and this will cause even more emissions . In order to reduce the population's dependency on beef, and the green house emissions it causes, we'd have to first raise awareness through major media outlets. Eventually, when people stop eating as much beef, we'd be able to reduce the cattle business, but the world also needs to find new jobs for those who work in beef production. We may be very far from this point, but having people think about it on discussion websites like this shows that we are at least making some progress!

7 posts
You must be logged in in order to post.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Privacy
Terms