February 5, 2021
Comparative cost-effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in the USA: a modelling study
Category: Article Summary
Topic: Modeling and Prediction
Keywords (Tags): modeling prediction, non-pharm interventions
A mathematical model suggests that in communities where the SARS-CoV-2 is spreading rapidly, weekly testing coupled with a 2-week isolation period after a positive test is advisable. The authors assessed eight surveillance testing strategies that varied by testing frequency (from daily to monthly testing) and isolation period (1 or 2 weeks), compared with the status-quo strategy of symptom-based testing and isolation. In communities without rapid viral spread, monthly testing with a 1-week isolation period after a positive test is expected to be the most optimal strategy.
Du et al. (Feb 4, 2021). Comparative cost-effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in the USA: a modelling study. The Lancet Public Health https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(21)00002-5/fulltext