|
by
Lossom Allen
On the
morning of March 8, 1970, two half-mile long columns of vehicles began
forming in a south Seattle neighborhood. The vehicles moved north towards
Seattle’s Magnolia neighborhood and the recently decommissioned Fort Lawton
Army installation. As the convoys headed north onlookers could see the red
cloth banners streaming from the antennas of the automobiles. When the
caravans reached their destinations, both the north and south sides of Fort
Lawton, the occupants of the cars launched a coordinated effort to occupy
the fort and establish it as a cultural and social services center for
Seattle’s growing Native American population. In the midst of the ensuing
struggle, the occupation’s principal organizer Bernie Whitebear stated, “We,
the Native Americans, reclaim the land known as Fort Lawton in the name of
all American Indians by right of discovery.”[1]
The Native activists who invaded Fort Lawton that day were
ultimately successful in their goal of establishing an urban Indian cultural
center at the site. While similar centers already existed in San Francisco,
Minneapolis, and New York, what was to become Daybreak Star Center was the
first to be established through militant protest. This paper tells the story
of the United Indians of All Tribes Foundation’s (UIATF) unique success in
its battle for Daybreak Star and, in a larger sense, for what Bernie
Whitebear later described as “self-determination.”[2]
Urban Indians and the Impetus for Invasion
The Fort Lawton invasion was a response to the declining state
of Native reservations and to the challenges faced by Seattle’s growing
urban Indian population, as well as the government’s apparent lack of
concern for either. In this sense, the invasion was years in the making.
During the 1950s the federal government began what it termed the policies of
Relocation and Termination in order to deal with the “Indian Problem.” This
meant that in an attempt to “liquidate all tribal assets, the federal
government set up relocation programs moving thousands of Indians into
cities with promises of better employment and educational opportunities.”[3]
It was no coincidence that the reservations identified for termination were
also those with the most wealth and natural resources. According to Fort
Lawton occupier and current UIATF board member Randy Lewis, the result was
that “overnight the richest reservations in the country became some of the
poorest counties in the country.”[4]
The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Indian Health
Service developed a concurrent Relocation policy that worked in tandem with
the policy of Termination to deprive Natives of government services. Many
Natives found that living in the stagnant economy of the reservation had
become impossible without the financial aid of the federal government and so
moved to cities in order to gain access to burgeoning urban economies.
Seattle’s Native population rose from 700 in 1950 to more than 4,000 in
1970.[5]
Under its Relocation policy, the federal government encouraged Natives to
migrate to cities and then ensured that once Indians left the reservation,
or the reservation was terminated, they were no longer under the
jurisdiction of the Tribal Governments or under the administrative authority
of the BIA. In effect, Relocation nullified the federal government’s
longstanding treaty obligations and further decreased its commitment to
Native populations. In doing so it dramatically reduced the amount of aid
the federal government was responsible for administering. Thus the
government could wash its hands of Native reliance on federal programs and
funding.
For Natives in Seattle, there were few places to
turn for help in an often new and unfamiliar urban setting. As there were
no federal, state, county, or city funds available, Natives had to rely on
volunteer social services. Most of these were provided by the American
Indian Women’s Service League, which operated out of an old church downtown.[6]
A free health care clinic also operated three nights a week in space donated
by the Marine Public Health Hospital. Volunteer doctors and nurses staffed
the clinic, utilizing donated pharmaceuticals stored in a lady’s restroom.[7]
By the late sixties, the city of Seattle was at least marginally
aware of the need to address the problems of urban Indians. In 1969, the
city assigned Blair Paul, a young University of Washington Law School
graduate who was working as a Seattle Human Rights Department officer, to
address the problem. Paul, who would become a founding member of the UIATF
board of trustees, recalls that the city and the Human Rights Department
hired him in an attempt to become more relevant within the widening context
of the Civil Rights Movement: “It was clear that other than blacks, by the
late sixties early seventies [the Civil Rights Movement] had really touched
very few other minority groups.”[8]
War on Poverty programs meant that millions of dollars were coming into
Seattle for minorities, but Indians were receiving none of these funds.
Neither the Service League nor Kinatechitapi, a Native American employment
assistance collective formed in 1969, were successful in securing any
federal funds. As one observer stated, the city “passed the buck” while
“millions of dollars poured into the Central District.”[9]
Paul felt that in order for Natives to be successful in the
competition for public assistance funds floating around at the time they
needed to organize. “Natives were not well organized,” he recalls. “They
weren’t organized at all. I was hired by the Department to focus on the
needs of urban Indians in Seattle. The first thing I did was to organize a
meeting at Kinatechitapi. There were as many as sixty different Indian
groups that showed up.”[10]
The meeting, held in September 1969, proved to be a success because it
provided a forum for the emergence of new leadership. . According to Paul,
that is where Bernie Whitebear began to show his abilities. “And the next
two years with Bernie, it was full tilt to the wall. An amazing, amazing
human being. I can’t speak highly enough of him.”[11]
Born Bernie Reyes in the small Eastern Washington town of
Inchelium on September 27, 1937, Whitebear
became aware of the problems facing urban Indians through first hand
experience. He was by birth a member of the
Colville Confederated Tribe, an amalgamation of eleven different Plateau
bands – Colville, San Poil, Nespelem, Lakes, Southern Okanogan, Entiat,
Methow, Columbia, Wenatchi, Palus, and Nez Perce – created in 1872 under
executive order of President Grant. He was also half Filipino, an ethnic mix
common enough that the term "Indipino" has entered the parlance of our time.[12]
Whitebear often had difficulty finding work and was aware of the
racism that Indians faced in American cities. As a young man living in
Tacoma, he fished the Puyallup River with his friend, Puyallup Native Bob
Saticum. Both men were having trouble finding work and fishing was the one
source of livelihood that racist hiring practices could not restrict Indians
from engaging in.
In 1959 Whitebear began meeting regularly with
other Natives in Tacoma, usually at Indian taverns, to discuss the problems
they faced and possible solutions. The core group, consisting of Whitebear
and Saticum, George Meachem, Robert Taylor, and Gary Kalapis, began
referring to themselves as the “Skins.” According to Whitebear’s brother and
biographer Lawney Reyes, “They spent most of their time drinking, talking,
and trying to solve all the world’s needs. But Bernie knew that this was
only a shallow exercise. He listened and became aware of the many problems
Natives faced each day but felt it was time to move on with his life, to
somehow help relieve the problems of his people instead of just talking
about them.”[13]
In
1961 Whitebear moved to Seattle where he began organizing events to make
Native concerns more visible to the White population and also creating
cultural activities to help affirm traditional Native identity among urban
Indians. He was aware of the political climate of Seattle during the mid to late sixties
and saw it as an opportunity to press Native grievances. “Seattle had the
Students of Democratic Society, the Black Panthers, United Black
Contractors, Vietnam War and United Farm Workers protestors,” he wrote.[14]
Whitebear was not alone in thinking it was time for Native people to be more
militant. At Western Washington University, Randy Lewis, also a Colville,
was helping to establish the American Indian Student Union. The hosted a
conference, The Right to be Indian Conference, “that drew together a lot of
people from throughout the nation,” Lewis recalls.
[15]
On November 20, dozens of young Native American activists
headed through San Francisco’s early morning fog toward the abandoned
Alcatraz penitentiary and forever changed the way Native Americans would
fight for their rights. Among them were a number of Northwest Natives,
including Bernie Whitebear and Randy Lewis. The activists who occupied
Alcatraz were for the most part young urban Indians who were either college
students or recent college graduates. Their strategy was militant,
confrontational, direct-action, non-violent protest. This was new in the
Indian community and contrasted with the strategy of older tribal government
officials, often referred to as “Uncle Tomahawks” by the new radical Indian
youth, who advocated a gradualist approach and held their leadership
positions through a perceived cozying up to non-Indian officials. The youth
felt that they were being misrepresented by traditional leaders, and for the
first time utilized their voices and stood in numbers behind such spokesmen
as Clyde Warrior, who in testimony before the President’s Advisory
Commission on Rural Poverty in 1967 illustrated the dissatisfaction of
Indian youth: “We are not free. We do not make choices. Our choices are made
for us; we are the poor. For those of us who live on reservations these
choices and decisions are made by federal administrators, bureaucrats, and
their ‘yes men,’ euphemistically called tribal governments.”[16]
The Alcatraz occupation lasted nearly eighteen months and was
ultimately joined by over five thousand protesters. The young activists
succeeded in capturing the attention of the national media and spotlighting
the plight of urban Indians. Their ultimate goal was to establish a Native
American university and cultural center on Alcatraz Island. Although
unsuccessful in this regard, their methods influenced and inspired
discontented and frustrated urban Indians around the country, including
Seattle.
Whitebear returned from Alcatraz with an even stronger
awareness of the need for a new, more radical approach in Seattle. This
awareness was catalyzed in 1970 when Richard Nixon signed a bill into law,
introduced by Washington Senators Henry Jackson and Warren G. Magnuson,
which enabled non-federal entities to obtain surplus federal lands for 0-50
percent of fair market value.[17]
Under the new law, the city of Seattle was eligible to acquire Fort Lawton
at little to no cost. The Service League and Kinatechitapi repeatedly
petitioned to have a portion of the fort set aside to accommodate a Native
cultural center. But the city denied their requests and suggested that they
appeal to the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Of course, the city knew that under
the policy of Relocation and Termination this would be pointless because the
BIA had no authority over urban Indians. To Whitebear and his cohorts, the
city’s actions displayed a complete lack of regard for its Native
population.[18]
Coming as it did on the heels of the Alcatraz occupation, Whitebear saw the
new law as an opportunity for political action.
In March of 1970, Whitebear was the
leader of a growing number of younger urban Indians who were tired of the
misrepresentation of the American Indian in Seattle politics and frustrated
by the city’s unwillingness to negotiate. Inspired by the success of the
Black Power movement and by the birth of Red Power and the recent occupation
of Alcatraz, and free from the older, more conservative Native leadership,
Whitebear organized for an assault on Fort Lawton." We felt he (Sen.
Jackson) had channeled us into oblivion,” said Whitebear. “And that touched
off the demonstrations at Fort Lawton.”[19]
Whitebear and the others felt the time was right to follow
the path of those who acted on Alcatraz and attempt to physically occupy
Fort Lawton. They sent out a national call for help.
As he later wrote, the “‘Moccasin Telegraph’ worked surprisingly well and
within days numbers of supporters began arriving in Seattle.”[21]
Among those pledging assistance were National Indian Youth Council members Clyde
Warrior, Vine Deloria, Shirley Whithill, and fellow Colville Randy Lewis.
When it became clear that members from the Indians of All Tribes on Alcatraz
would be willing to help in the occupation of Fort Lawton, as would similar
groups from Canada led by George Abbot, the decision to act
was sealed.[22]
Phase One: Occupation
Whitebear didn’t see the breaching of the Fort’s defenses and
gaining access to the area as much of an obstacle as he had spent plenty of
time training on the grounds as both a paratrooper and as a special forces
soldier, as did a Garry Brey another member of the invading group.[23]
The most challenging portion to him would be organizing all of the potential
occupants that had no training. The night before the invasion, drawing on
the connections of his heritage, Whitebear organized a powwow at the
Filipino Community hall in south Seattle, both to celebrate the coming
operations and to communicate to as many people as possible the plans for
the invasion.[24]
At the powwow Whitebear addressed the potential participants with the
message that, “it may get rough. I want you all to hold you temper, in
spite of the difficulty and pain you might face. If any of you need alcohol
or drugs to get you through this, forget it. I don’t want to make the same
mistakes that were made at Alcatraz. I want to win this one.”
[25]
The efforts of the powwow were successful and on the
following morning, March 8, 1970, more than 100 participants mustered into
two half-mile long convoys and began the drive to opposite ends of the Fort.[26]
As the caravans drove towards the north and south ends of the Fort the
vehicles made no efforts to maintain operational security as vehicles
proudly displayed Native Pride banners from their aerials.[27]
On the morning of March 8, 1970 more than one hundred
protesters scaled the fences on both the north and south ends of Fort
Lawton, draping blankets over the razor wire as they climbed over. They
quickly set up tepees and drum circles and began singing traditional Native
songs. A Reserve Military Police (MP) company completing its weekend
drilling was surprised by the invasion and, in turn, surprised the invaders.
“We didn’t realize there were still soldiers on the base,” Randy Lewis said
later. The MPs requested help from Fort Lewis and armed troops soon arrived
alongside squads of Seattle police officers. With bolstered numbers they
descended on the occupiers and began marching or carrying them away through
a blackberry patch toward awaiting trucks. This was done not out of malice
said one soldier, but because “the Army always does everything the hard
way.”[28]
While the papers reported little more than this, Randy Lewis recalls a much
more violent removal:
“People were injured, MPs were injured, equipment was
destroyed, jeeps were flipped over … barracks were torched. We had kids,
little kids who came in with us who sought safety under some barracks and
the MPs didn’t know who was under there, just that some were under there so
they threw these … grenades in there. Tear gas grenades and the kids threw
them back out. This continued and finally the kids just torched the
barracks. The littlest of kids did the greatest damage; they torched three
of the barracks here.”[29]
Lewis’s version is supported by Lawney Reyes in Reyes’s biography of his
brother, Bernie Whitebear. “At times tempers were lost and fighting broke
out,” Reyes writes. “The leaders Bernie had selected had to intervene more
than once to maintain order. The Indians that were caught were put in the
stockade.”[30]
While the occupiers were removed from inside the fort, the
protest continued outside the gates. Indeed, the demonstrators who gathered
en masse to continue the fight were a critical component of the invasion’s
success. As Reyes recalls, “Outside the main gate of Fort Lawton, five
hundred Indians and non-Indian allies assembled to show their support to the
invading activists. The Media was there with their cameras.”[31]
There is considerable debate over the actual numbers of protesters outside
the gates. Some estimates claim hundreds of participants while others
remember the numbers ranging from fifty to ninety. Those who were outside
carried lighthearted signs with messages such as “Custer Wore Arrow Shirts”
and “Kill Our Women, Rape Our Buffalo.”[32]
The protesters remained outside of the front gates for three weeks, thanks
in part to the support they received from community members who supplied the
vigil, which became known as “Resurrection City,” with food and clothing.
Hewlett’s Catering, owners of Tillicum Village, provided a catered meal each
day.[33]
These protesters caused the Army such consternation that two active duty
companies were sent to Fort Lawton from Fort Lewis to install nearly one
mile of concertina wire around the entrance to prevent any further
invasions.[34]
Despite the army’s new security measures, Indian leaders were
anxious to maintain their momentum and the interest of the press, as well as
to perhaps exorcise grudges over the rough treatment the protesters had
received on March 8. “The beatings we took were not going to be forgotten,”
said Lewis about the first invasion.[35]
Consequently, a second invasion was planned to take place four days later.
The group found that the only viable access to the fort was from the least
likely of approaches, the water. On March 12, complete with teepees, drums,
elderly persons, and children, the group infiltrated the south end of the
fort. They scaled the large bluffs abutting the fort by clinging to the root
systems of the trees that grew out of the cliffs. They also shrewdly timed
the foot patrols of the guards and were able to set up their teepees, build
a fire, and begin a drum circle in between the rotation of the sentries.
Randy Lewis remembers the reaction of the guard upon discovering the
invasion: “The next time he comes by he goes, what the hell! There are a
hundred Indians over there drumming and singing. What happened?”[36]
The MPs soon descended once again, coming in force and in full riot gear.
Before they could see the MPs the occupiers heard the thumping of their
black jacks as they advanced in unison. Lewis recounts climbing a ridge to
get a better look. “I was with Douglas Remington, who was a Ute Indian from
Utah of all places … We climbed this ridge and as far as the eye could see
there were MPs marching. They crested the hill and we all figured this is
it. It’s going to be Wounded Knee all over again.”[37]
This time the occupiers chose not fight back, but rather fell limp to the
ground in nonviolent resistance. “We didn’t want to risk the old people or
the Children,” Lewis said. Still, they did not go easily. Lewis remembers
Grace Thorpe, the daughter of famed athlete Jim Thorpe saying, “‘I stand
over six feet tall and it’s going to take eight of you to move me.’ And it
did.”[38]
Eventually, the occupants were rounded up and once again taken to Fort
Lawton’s stockade.
While the city’s general population seemed to be behind the
Native group after the occupation, there was considerable dissent from
within the Native community. After meeting with Army officials, Whitebear
and his group felt compelled to defend their actions to the Native elements
of the community who thought they were inappropriate and counterproductive.
During a meeting held at the Alaska Native Services building the invaders
were faced with strong opposition. Much of it stemmed from the American
Indian Women’s Service League and especially its founder, Pearl Warren, who
felt that militant action would jeopardize the modest funding the city was
already granting to Natives.[39]Although
he himself was a militant activist, Randy Lewis regrets the divisions caused
by the invasion. “The old guard in the Service League in many ways felt they
were being ignored, resented, and even displaced. If I could do one thing
different I would honor those women for what they had done previously, and
apologize to them for the ill will that was brought on to them because that
was a lot of pain.” Thus, in Lewis’s words, the invasion “both galvanized
and factionalized our community.”[40]
Resurrection City remained
outside of the front gates of the fort for over three weeks, complete with
functional teepees and continuous demonstrations to block and complicate the
mission of the Army personnel attempting to operate in the area. By the end
of March, Indian leaders faced a decision. According to Lewis, “We had to
decide if we were going to stay or go, so we met again at the Filipino
Community Center and decided to call it quits on April 1st. We decided to
take down Resurrection City the next day. Frank White Buffaloman, an old
Sioux medicine man that lived in the area told the press that there would be
a message from the sky that day. Everybody poo pooed him of course and
Frank was out there when we were holding our press conference and from up in
the sky … Frank had hired a sky writer and it says, ‘Surrender Ft. Lawton.’”[41]
As the teepees were being taken down about fifty Indians, accompanied by
television crews and cameras, rushed past the guards for a third and final
occupation on April 2, 1970.[42]
The Natives scattered throughout the base while MPs began making immediate
arrests. When Seattle Times reporter Don Hannula reached Bernie
Whitebear for comment, Whitebear said that the third occupation was “an
effort to reaffirm Indian demands that surplus designated Fort Lawton land
be turned over for a multipurpose and education center.”[43]
As Resurrection City came down and the trespassing Natives spent their last
night in Fort Lawton’s stockade, Whitebear announced the transition from
occupation to negotiation.[44]
Phase Two: Negotiation
The most immediate success of the occupation of Fort Lawton was
the effect it had on public opinion. As Whitebear wrote, “the invasions and
occupations had achieved one major objective, gaining commitments of support
from the local residents of Seattle.”[45]
Perhaps even more important than local support was the support of
actress/activist Jane Fonda, whose impact on public opinion, not only
locally but nationally and even internationally, cannot be understated.
Fonda, perhaps more than anyone else, got Bernie Whitebear through the door
and brought the politicians to the bargaining table.[46]
“She broadcast that face and that Barbarella body,” said Lewis of Fonda’s
involvement. While she did little at the actual occupation her leverage and
media presence granted Whitebear and others the foothold they needed to
begin the bargaining process for the land they desired.
Whitebear was advised by attorneys Garry Bass and Blair Paul
to form an organization that could be seen as representative of the Natives
in Seattle during the negotiations to come. The new organization was named
the United Indians of All Tribes Foundation and was sponsored by the
National Congress of American Indians, the largest Indian organization in
the United States at the time, in addition to more than forty non-Indian
organizations throughout King County.[47]
This level of public support enabled a UIATF committee to gain an audience
with BIA commissioner Louis Bruce. The committee, consisting of Whitebear,
Randy Lewis, Dr. Frances Svensson and others, successfully convinced Bruce
to place a hold on Fort Lawton lands, thereby preserving their status as
“surplus” federal land, until further negotiations could be completed. Bruce
was later pressured politically by the Department of the Interior to remove
the hold because it represented a breach of the BIA’s policy of refusing to
deal with urban Indians.[48]
In the meantime, the hold meant that the city could not acquire the land.
The temporary hold enabled the UIATF to make an application
for part of the property prior to the city of Seattle’s application through
the Department of the Interior. This early application put the UIATF on
equal ground with the city of Seattle in the eyes of the General Services
Administration, which was responsible for final disposal of federal surplus
property. The early application reportedly enraged Mayor Uhlman, who had
been lobbying for the property for years. Whitebear responded by stating
that he could “understand how they felt after 10 years of work to get the
property for the city, but I remember that we’ve had 300 years of
injustice.”[49]
The move, in conjunction with pressure from Senator Jackson, forced Uhlman
to negotiate with the UIATF. Senator Jackson was at the time a candidate for
the Democratic presidential nomination. As one negotiator pointed out to the
Seattle Post Intelligencer, “Jackson turned on the Heat. He needed to
improve his image with Indians, and the last thing in the world he wanted
was to have a bunch of them here and elsewhere on the warpath.”[50]
Negotiations started in June of 1971 and were not completed
until November when it was agreed that the UIATF would lease twenty acres
for a 99-year period with options for successive 99-year leases without
renegotiation. The agreement was approved, executed and incorporated on
March 29, 1972 and the surplus land was transferred on August 30.[51]
Bernie Whitebear was sure to refer to the agreement as anything but a
treaty: “it’s not a treaty. The white man doesn’t keep treaties. It’s a
legal, binding, agreement.”[52]
With the agreement reached, the next task was to develop the
program for the cultural center, to design the buildings, and to seek funds
for their construction. In March of 1973 the city of Seattle designated
$500,000 of its general revenue sharing funds for the development of the
cultural center. An additional grant of $250,000 was awarded from the
Economic Development Administration (EDA). Both the city and the EDA later
contributed more funds to the project in addition to the timber the UIATF
received form the Colville, Quinault, and Makah Tribes. In the end, the
total construction cost reached $1.2 million.[53]
With the funding for the center secured, the groundbreaking occurred on
September 27, 1975. Eighteen months later, on May 13, 1977, the building,
which Lawney Reyes helped design, was dedicated.
The invasion of Fort Lawton was not a total victory. The
activists had hoped to secure all ten thousand acres of surplus land and in
the end received only forty.[54]
And the militant nature of the protest caused dissension within Seattle’s
Indian community along generational lines. Yet in other important respects
the invasion was a momentous success. Alongside the Alcatraz takeover, it
signaled to the city of Seattle and the nation that urban Indians would
fight for rights, redress, and respect by any means necessary. In this way,
it is inseparable from other radical movements for social justice and civil
rights involving persons of color, women, and the working-class that have
defined the period between the late 1960s and mid 1970s. The invasion also
resulted in the formation of the United Indians of All Tribes Foundation, a
crucial institutional body that continues to unify the Native community
across diverse tribal affiliations. Equally important, the Daybreak Star
Center filled, and continues to fill, a vital place in Seattle’s Native
community as both a provider of essential social services and a preserver of
Native history and culture. The UIATF named the center Daybreak Star after a
vision by Black Elk, a Sioux medicine man. According to the center’s
official history, Black Elk’s vision foretold of “a ‘daybreak star herb,’
the herb of ‘understanding,’ falling to the ground and blossoming forth on
one stem in four directions … a black, a white, a scarlet and a yellow. The
four colors symbolize the four races of mankind united in four directions …
spiritually, physically, mentally and emotionally. On March 8, 1970, the
herb fell to the ground.”[55]
Copyright
(c) Lossom Allen 2006
HSTAA 498 Fall 2005; HSTAA 499 Spring 2006
[1]
Lawney L. Reyes, Bernie Whitebear: An Urban Indian’s Quest for
Justice (Tuscan Arizona: The University of Arizona Press, 2006),
100
[2]
Bernie Whitebear, “Self-Determination Taking Back Fort Lawton:
Meeting the Needs of Seattle’s Native American Community Through
Conversation” (Seattle, United Indians of All Tribes Foundation,
1994)
[3]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination Taking Back Fort Lawton,”3
[4]
Randy Lewis, interviewed by Teresa Brownwolf Powers, Daybreak Star,
November 12, 2005
[5]
Coll-Peter Thrush, “The Crossing Over Place: Urban and Indian
Histories in Seattle,” (PhD diss., University of Washington, 2002),
303 and 315
[6]
Thrush, “The Crossing Over Place,” 307
[7]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 3
[8]
Blair Paul, interviewed by Lossom Allen and Trevor Griffey, April
26, 2006
[9]
Thrush, “The Crossing Over Place,” 314. The Central District is home
to Seattle’s largest concentration of African Americans.
[10]
Blair Paul interview
[11]
Blair Paul interview
[12]
Kathleen Dahl, “The Battle Over Termination on the Colville Indian
Reservation,” 32
[14]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 5
[15]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[16]
Collin Calloway, First Peoples: A Documentary Survey of American
Indian History, 450
[17]
“Discovery Park 1972 Original Master Plan: Commemorative Edition
Reissue 1992,” (Seattle: Friends of Discovery Park), 15
[18]
“The Indian Struggles,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, July 27,
1974, sec. A, p. 6
[19]
Shelby Scates, “Whitebear Leads the Indians to Victory in Ft. Lawton
Battle,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, December 5, 1971, p.5
[20]
Reyes, Bernie Whitebear, 98
[21]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 5
[22]
Randy Lewis, 1st interview
[23]
Randy
Lewis, 1st interview.
[24]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 5
[25]
Reyes, Bernie Whitebear, 100
[26]
Richard Simmons, “Indians Invade Ft. Lawton,” Seattle Times,
March 10 1970
[27]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 5
[28]
“Army Disrupts Indian Claim on Ft. Lawton,” Seattle
Post-Intelligencer,
[29]
Randy Lewis, 1st interview
[30]
Reyes, Bernie Whitebear, 100
[31]
Reyes, Bernie Whitebear, 100
[32]
Don Hannula, “Indian Picket Line Remains at Ft. Lawton,” Seattle
Times, March 11, 1970, sec. A, p. 1
[33]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[34]
“Reinforcements for Ft. Lawton,” Seattle Times, sec. A
[35]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[36]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[37]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[38]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[39]
Reyes, Bernie Whitebear, 103
[40]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[41]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[42]
Don Hannula, “Indians Again Try to Occupy Fort Lawton; 80 Detained,”
Seattle Times, April 2, 1970, sec. A, p. 1
[44]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 6
[45]
Whitebear, “Self-Determination,” 6
[46]
Stephen Dunphy, “Jane Fonda Uses ‘Leverage to Aid Cause of Indian
Rights,” Seattle Times, March 8, 1970, sec, A, p. 20
[47]
“The Indian Struggles,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, July 27,
1974, sec. A, p.6
[49]
Shelby Scates, “Whitebear Leads the Indians to Victory in Ft. Lawton
Battle,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, December 5, 1971, p.6
[51]
Summary History of Relationship Between the City of Seattle and
the United Indians of All Tribes Foundations, (Seattle: United
Indians of All Tribes Foundation), 1
[52]
Shelby Scates, “Whitebear Leads the Indians to Victory in Ft. Lawton
Battle,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, December 5, 1971, p.5
[53]
“All of the people who are a part of the United Indians of All
Tribes Foundation’s history, and all of their ancestors who endured
and survived in order that the herb of understanding might blossom,”
United Indians of All Tribes Foundation: A Ten Year History:
March 8, 1970- March 8, 1980 (Seattle: United Indians of All
Tribes, 1980), 4
[54]
Randy Lewis, 2nd interview
[55]
United Indians of All Tribes Foundation, “All of the people,” 2
|
Siege of Fort Lawton, March 1970. Photo: Museum of History and Industry
[click images to enlarge]

United
Indians of All Tribes Foundation today operates Daybreak Star Cultural
Center. Click the logo to learn more about it.

Bernie Whitebear led the campaign to reclaim Fort Lawton and was the
director of United Indians of All Tribes Foundation until his death from
colon cancer in 2000. This 1971 photo is courtesy of the Museum of History
and Industry.

Lawney Reyes chronicles the life of this
brother, Bernie Whitebear, in this recent biography. Reyes, who helped design
Daybreak Star Cultural Center, speaks about his brother and about the Fort
Lawton struggle in an interview below.

Above:
aerial view of Fort Lawton, 1948. Photo: University of Washington Special
Collections. Below: Daybreak Star Cultural Center.


Indian
Center News was the publication of the American Indian Women's Service
League. Founded in 1958 and operating out of a downtown church, AIWSL was
the core institution for Seattle's urban Indians, providing health services
and a place to gather. Click here to read the nearly
complete digital collection of Indian Center News that has been compiled by
Teresa Brownwolf Powers. Also see Karen Smith, American Indian Women's Service
League: Raising the Cause of Urban Indians, 1958-1971.
Oral Histories
For
more stories and important perspectives on the Fort Lawton campaigns.
Follow these links to interviews with:
Lawney Reyes
Randy Lewis
Blair Paul
Wes Uhlman

Newspaper Coverage
We
have compiled a digital database of newspaper articles starting with the
first invasion in March 1970 through the negotiations with the city and
federal government and the opening of the Daybreak Star Cultural Center in
1977. Click the link above to see and read the full list of articles from the
Seattle Times, Seattle PI, UW Daily, Seattle Helix,
Seattle Medium, Bremerton Sun, and Akwesasne Notes. Karen Smith analyzes that media attention in United Indians of All Tribes Meets the Press: News Coverage of the 1970 Occupation of Fort Lawton.
Below
are selected articles. Click to enlarge and read.

Seattle PI, March 9, 1970

Seattle PI, March 9, 1970

The Helix, Seattle's underground newspaper, published the United
Indians of All Tribes proclamation March 20, 1970

The University of Washington Daily wrote sympathetically about the
takeover and in this article reported on the harsh tactics of the MPs.
3/11/1970

Seattle Times, March 8, 1970

Seattle Times, March 10, 1970

Seattle Times, March 11, 1970

Seattle Times, March 16, 1970

Seattle Times, March 17, 1970

Seattle Times, April 2, 1970

Seattle Times, April 14, 1970

Seattle Times, November 15, 1971

Seattle PI, November 14, 1971

Seattle PI, December 5, 1971

Seattle PI, December 13, 1971
|