Bunchgrass Ridge

Ecology and restoration of conifer-invaded meadows:
Research and adaptive management

     
Home > Research > 4. Restoration experiment > Methods: Treatments
     
4. Experimental restoration of meadow communities
 
Home
Study area
Research
1. Conifer invasion
2. Vegetation responses
3. Gopher disturbance
4. Restoration experiment Back to Conifer invasion
 
  Introduction
  Methods
 
  Experimental design
> Treatments
  Sampling
  Results
  Conclusions
 
Recent results
  Burn-scar recovery
  Conifer reinvasionNew results
  Community reassemblyNew results
Education
Outreach
Products
Participants
Key findings
   
 
Hosted by
UW link
Privacy | Terms
 
Methods: Treatment implementation    
Tree removal (Jan-Feb 2006)
  • Logging was conducted on deep, compacted snow to minimize soil disturbance.
  • Directional felling was used to avoid disturbance to control plots.
  • To minimize fuel accumulation, trees were yarded with limbs attached, if possible.
On this page:
Tree removal
  Winter harvest
Fuel-reduction methods
  Pile-and-burn
  Broadcast burn
Winter harvest 2006   Felling
Winter harvest 2006 (Photo: Teiva White) Felling with chainsaws (Photo: Teiva White) Mechanical faller (Photo: Teiva White)
Snow cover minimized soil disturbance
 
Larger trees were cut with chainsaws (left) and smaller trees, with a mechanical faller (right)
Skidding and yarding Loading
Rubber-tired skidder (Photo: Teiva White) Tracked skidder (Photo: Teiva White) Hydraulic log loader (Photo: Teiva White)
Rubber-tired (left) and tracked (right) skidders were used to yard boles to an off-site landing

.

 
A hydraulic log loader limbed and cut logs at the landing.

Fuel reduction methods (Sep-Nov 2006)

Top
Pile-and-burn (unburned) treatment  
  • Slash piles (~2 m tall, 2-4 m in diameter) were constructed by hand in Jun 2006 and covered with polyethylene film to shed water.
  • Piles were placed in locations not sampled for vegetation.
  • Ignition occurred on the morning of 2 Nov 2006 after an extended period of dry weather.
  • Piles burned to completion the next day (95-100% consumption).
Weather conditions

At 09:30 hr, temperature was 5ºC (41ºF), relative humidity was 100%, winds were SW at 3.2 km/hr (2 mph), and cloud cover was complete.

Two-day rainfall (2-3 Nov) at the McKenzie Bridge Ranger Station (451 m elevation) totaled 3.3 cm
Pile-and-burn
Post-harvest, 28 Sep 2006
Post-harvest burn piles
Pile burn, 2 Nov 2006
Pile burning
Post-burn, 28 Jun 2007
Post burning
Pile-burning
Areas between slash piles did not burn
Areas between slash piles did not burn
Top
Broadcast burn treatment    
  • Narrow fire lines (~50 cm wide) were constructed around each plot. Within these lines, duff was removed to mineral soil.
  • A hose-lay with multiple pumping stations was established to distribute water. Hoses extended as far as ~1 km to the most distant plot. Water was hauled by fire engines from a distance of ~5 km and used for pre-burn wetting of areas adjacent to the experimental plots, as well as for holding and mop-up operations.
  • Slash was burned on 28 Sep 2006, between 11:15 and 14:30 hr.
  • Individual plots burned to completion within 0.5 to 2 hr of ignition. Flame lengths averaged 1-2 m (max 2.4 m). Fine fuel loadings (1- to 100-hr) averaged 53-69 Mg/ha and consumption averaged 67-87% among plots. Areas that were shaded by adjacent forest burned less intensively, as did areas lacking woody debris.
Weather conditions

Air temperatures were 21-24ºC (70-75ºF), relative humidity was 25-27%, and wind speeds were 0-5 km/hr (0-3 mph) with no cloud cover.

Fuel moisture prior to ignition averaged 12% (10-hr), 16% (100-hr), and 28% (1000-hr).
Broadcast burn
Post-harvest, 29 Sep 2006
Post-harvest
Broadcast burn, 29 Sep 2006 
Broadcast burn
Post-burn, 2 Jul 2007
Post burning
Post-harvest fuel loadings
Post-harves fuel loadings
TopPrevious page Methods: Design Methods: Sampling Next page