Bunchgrass Ridge

Ecology and restoration of conifer-invaded meadows:
Research and adaptive management

     
Home > Research > 4. Restoration experiment > Results: Question 1
     
4. Experimental restoration of meadow communities
 
Home
Study area
Research
1. Conifer invasion
2. Vegetation responses
3. Gopher disturbance
4. Restoration experiment Back to Conifer invasion
 
  Introduction
  Methods
  Results
 
> Q1. Tree removal
  Q2. Fuel-reduction methods
  Q3. Duration of tree influence
  Conclusions
 
Recent results
  Burn-scar recovery
  Conifer reinvasionNew results
  Community reassemblyNew results
Education
Outreach
Products
Participants
Key findings
   
 
Hosted by
UW link
Privacy | Terms
 
Results  

Q1. Is tree removal sufficient to promote the abundance or diversity of native meadow species? Are there additional ecological benefits of fire?

Tree removal, with or without burning, benefited meadow species at the expense of forest herbs (figure, below: right column; photos below). Meadow species responded positively to tree removal immediately (2007) for richness and within 3 yr (2009) for cover.

Forest herbs declined dramatically in cover and richness, even in the absence of fire (figure, below: left column).

Fire did not appear critical to shifting the dominance from forest to meadow species. For most measures of vegetation response, effects of burning were statistically no different from those of tree removal alone.
Changes in cover and richness of forest and meadow species graph
Changes in cover and richness (species per subplot) of forest and meadow species, one and three years after treatment. Values are plot means (+1 SE, n = 3). Letters denote significant differences among means within years.
Effects of tree removal
and fire on forest herbs
Achlys triphylla and Smilacina stellata--shade-adapted forest plants
Shade-adapted forest herbs. Note the leaf morphology and horizontal orientation
Achlys triphylla sun-leaves
Achlys triphylla
Smilacina stellata-sun leaves
Smilacina stellata
The same herbs after tree removal and burning. Note the morphology and vertical orientation of leaves exposed to the sun.

Top
Pile-burned treatment
2007 2009
1 year after pile burning 3 years after pile burning
Unburned area of pile-burned treatment, two and four years after tree removal (left and right, respectively). The area without stumps in the foreground was open meadow prior to tree removal.
Broadcast-burned treatment
2007 2009
1 year after broadcast burning 3 years after broadcast burning
One and three years after broadcast burning (left and right, respectively). The unburned area in the foreground was open meadow prior to tree removal and burning. The large stumps in the background (mid-right) were a small patch of old (>140 yr) Abies grandis, prior to tree removal.
Results: Q2. Fuel-reduction methods Next page
Previous page Methods: Sampling