Responsible authorship and publication

Related readings

2015 Program series:

  • Bhandari M, et al. Perceptions of authors contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67 (2014) 1049e1054
  • Leonard M, et al. Perceptions of Plagiarism by STEM Graduate Students. 2014 Sci Eng Ethics DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9604-2
  • Cutas D, Shaw D. Writers Blocked On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement. 2014 Sci Eng Ethics DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0

Readings/articles from previous years:

  • Hvistendahl M. China's publication bazaar. Science (New York, N.Y.). Nov 29 2013;342(6162):1035-1039.
  • Kearney MH. Be a responsible co-author. Research in nursing & health. Feb 2014;37(1):1-2.
  • Roederer M, Marciniak MW, O'Connor SK, Eckel SF. An integrated approach to research and manuscript development. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Jul 15 2013;70(14):1211-1218.
  • Fang FC, Steen RG, & Casadevall A (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of
    retracted scientific publications.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109(42): 17028-33.
  • Fang FC & Casadevall A (2013). Why we cheat: Scientists are unraveling the causes of fraud and dishonesty and devising new strategies for rooting them out. Scientific American Mind, May/June 25(3): 33-39.
  • Marcus A & Oransky I (2011).  The paper is not sacred.  Nature, 480: 449-450.
  • Schooler J (2011) Unpublished results hide the decline effect.  Nature, 470: 437.
    Optional Reading:
    Lehrer J (2010).  Annals of Science, The Truth Wears Off - Is there something wrong with the scientific method?  (Dec 13, 2010)  Read more    
  • Strange K (2008).  Authorship: why not just toss a coin?  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C567–C575, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008.