Course Descriptions (as of March 7, 2007)
The following course descriptions have been written by individual instructors
to provide more detailed information on specific sections than that found
in the General Catalog. When individual descriptions are not available,
the General Catalog descriptions [in brackets] are used. (Although we try
to have as accurate and complete information as possible, this schedule
remains subject to change.)
To Spring 300-level
courses
To Spring 400-level
courses
To 2006-2007 Senior Seminars
200 A (Reading Literature)
M-Th 8:30
Chaemsaethong
(W)
krisda@u.washington.edu
The Language of Literature. In this class we will focus our attention on the
language of literature. We will begin with the question of what constitutes “literature.” Then
we will examine how various writers and poets of British and American literature
shape their works by means of language, and how language can shed light on
and illuminate how we read their works. We will first read selections of chapters
from Short Mick’s “Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose,” and
apply his techniques to selections of British and American literature, including
Beowulf, “Dream of the Rood,” Sir Gawain and the Green
Knight,
Shakespeare, Cavalier poets, Milton, Pope, Poe, and Mark Twain. Texts: Beowulf;
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight;
Milton, Paradise Lost and Other Poems (ed. Comte & Cifelli); Shakespeare,
Four Great Comedies: Taming of the Shrew, Midsummer Night’s Dream,
Twelfth Night, The Tempest; photocopied course packet (available at Ave
Copy Center).
200 B (Reading Literature)
M-Th 9:30
Sands
(W)
sandst@u.washington.edu
Narrative Pleasures. The University’s general description claims that
the “emphasis” of this course will be “on literature as a
source of pleasure and knowledge about human experience,” and thus implicitly
suggests an epistemological distinction between pleasure and knowledge. Further,
this claim is underwritten by what seem to be two contradictory logics of the
general and the particular: one, that literary study in the collective space
of the college classroom enables a highly particularized, individuated affective
experience named “pleasure”; the second, that literary study enables
particularized, individuated students to come to some common understanding
of “human experience” – a domain that is knowable, presumably,
because of its homogeneous, transhistorical character (note the singular noun).
Using these tacit assumptions and structuring contradictions as sites of intervention,
this course will introduce students to practices of literary study that resist
reading literature as merely a “reflection” of an already established
social reality. Rather, we will read literature as a terrain that at once articulates,
contests, and generates social meaning. Taking “pleasure” (in its
multiple formations) as our domain of inquiry rather than our desired effect,
and ”contemporary” U.S. literary texts as our archive, we will
as: How do deployments of “pleasure” render certain subjects/ individuals
intelligible, legitimate, and part of “human experience” while
conversely rendering others illegible, illegitimate, and non- or not quite
human? How are these deployments both overdetermining of, and overdetermined
by discourses of gender, race, sexuality, economic class, and nation/national
citizenship? The overarching goal of this course, then, is to engage a range
of U.S. literary texts to query the effectiveness of refusing the distinction
between pleasure and knowledge such that pleasure is rethought as both a key
domain through which humans are known and categorized, and as a site through
which humans, in their gendered, racialized, sexed, classed, and nationalized
particularities, bring those formations of knowledge to a crisis.
The quarter, of course, will be more pleasurable for all if students complete assigned readings, attend class regularly, complete written work in a timely manner (including bi-weekly short papers, a mid-term exam, and a final essay of some length), and come with a spirit of good cheer and intellectual rigor. Texts: James Baldwin, Just Above My Head; Lawrence Chua, Gold by the Inch; Samuel Delany, Times Square Red, Times Square Blue; Ursula LeGuin, The Left Hand of Darkness; Gayl Jones, Corregidora.
200 C (Reading Literature)
M-Th 10:30
Kae
(W)
hjk2@u.washington.edu
Broadly, this class will dwell on the possibilities and limits of reading literature
as representative of human experience. Literary production has often challenged
or, at least, troubled claims to authentic representation that imply singular
ways of knowing or reading. We will interrogate this contestatory relationship
by focusing on 20th-century American urban novels that engage with a diverse
range of narrative strategies to represent the experience of the individual
and her built environment. Employing different interpretive practices, we will
also consider how different intersections of class, race, sex, and gender come
to bear on the confluence between the built environment and individual development
to further complicate reading the literary as a source of knowledge. Texts:
John Dos Passos, Manhattan Transfer; Ann Petry, The Street;
Ralph Ellison,
The Invisible Man; Thomas Pynchon, Crying of Lot 49; Fae
Myenne Ng, Bone; photocopied
course packet.
200 D (Reading Literature)
M-Th 11:30
McNair
(W)
amcnair@u.washington.edu
This course will cover a range of authors from the 16th through the 20th century,
all of whom spend time exploring various sleep states, from visions and dreams
to drug-induced hallucinations and somnambulism. Through a wide variety of
texts, we’ll be able to explore a plethora of different topics including,
but not limited to, love, religion, consciousness, aesthetics, gender, sexuality,
race, politics, all while sketching a rough cultural history of what it means
to sleep and dream and potentially answering some of the following questions:
What does it mean to be asleep or awake? Is there a clear division between
the two? What do we understand dreams to be and has this idea shifted over
time? What is the role of interpretation in dreams (if any at all)? The overarching
goals in all of this, however are to hone your ability to close read texts
and use these close readings to develop your abilities to think analytically
and develop sophisticated and intriguing arguments about the literature we
read. In addition to reading several novels and novellas by Thomas De Quincey,
Charles Brockden Brown, G. K. Chesterton, Nathanael West, and Ursula LeGuin,
we will also be reading poems and short stories by Donne, Shakespeare, Blake,
Coleridge, Byron, Irving, Hawthorne, Poe, Dickinson, Whitman, Hopkins, Bierce,
James, and Plath, among others. This course will be discussion-based, so students
should come to class every day prepared to offer comments and ask questions. Texts: Thomas
De Quincey, Confessions of an English Opium
Eater; Charles Brockden
Brown, Edgar Huntly; Or Memoirs of a Sleep-Walker; G. K. Chesterton, The
Man Who Was Thursday; Nathanael West, The Dream Life of Balso Snell;
Ursula K. LeGuin, The Lathe of Heaven.
200 E (Reading Literature)
M-Th: 12:30
Golden
(W)
apg3@u.washington.edu
British Modernism and the Creative Process. The first half of the twentieth
century gave rise to unparalleled creativity and complexity in literary expression.
We will explore the changing content and context of art and literature in England
and Ireland. The modern world infiltrates literary works in abstract and concrete
ways. Objects and artifacts will become anchors for our imagination of the
worlds that characters and writers inhabit. We will also read scholarship that
uses archival and material sources to analyze and contextualize modernist texts.
As we navigate texts that differ in style and shape, central topics will include
writers’ methods of representing consciousness, artistic circles, gender,
war, and the British Empire. Texts: D. H. Lawrence, Sons
and Lovers; James Joyce, Portrait
of the Artist as a Young Man; David Garnett, Lady into Fox; Virginia
Woolf,
To the Lighthouse;
E. M. Forster, A Passage to India; photocopied course packet (available
at Ave Copy Center).
200 F (Reading Literature)
M-Th 1:30
Van Rijswijk
(W)
hvr@u.washington.edu
Introduction to Law and Literature. This class seeks to explore the intersections,
contradictions and collusions of law and literature. This is a reading-intensive
course, broken roughly into two sections. You will first read Kafka, and I
will ask you to use The Trial to establish your own close-reading practices,
in which you pay attention to the uses and contexts of language. In the second
half we will read Banks, Barker and Woolf, as well as some cases. In this second
half we will look at personal injury law, and literary representations of accidents
and their consequences. We will think about how to talk about law and literature
together: How do they relate to each other? How are legal and literary texts
produced differently? What are the consequences of reading them together? Course
work will include a demanding reading schedule, participation in class discussion,
a mid-term and a final essay. Texts: Russell Banks, The
Sweet Hereafter; Pat Barker, The
Ghost Road; Kafka,
The Trial; Virginia Woolf, Mrs. Dalloway.
200G (Reading Literature)
M-Th 2:30
Browning
(W)
vtb76@u.washington.edu
This course will focus on representations of the body in medieval literature.
We will examine a variety of genres: romance, epic, hagiography, tragedy etc
. . . Our discussions will center on three topics: gender, sexuality and images
of strength and weakness. Students will become comfortable with reading and engaging
with medieval literature, and be able to construct complex arguments about the
representation of the body in different genres of literature from the same period.
This course will focus on discussion; this means that you must keep up with the
reading and come to class prepared to engage in a discussion with your classmates.
There will be several short response papers, two exams and one final essay.
Texts: Heaney, tr., Beowulf: A Verse Translation; photocopied course packet.
202 A (Introduction to the Study of English Language & Literature)
MWF 10:30 (lecture) quizzes: Th 11:30, 12:30, 2:30
Staten
hstaten@u.washington.edu
This course is intended to enable English majors to understand, and participate
in, contemporary debates in literary history, literary criticism/theory, and
the politics of interpretation. We will therefore discuss both literary and
critical/theoretical works, always reflecting on the context within which our
discussions take place. That is, we will reflect that we are in an English
department in an American university at a specific moment in history, and that
what we find in the works we read is not what other people at other times and
places would have found; and we will attempt to understand the nature of the
historical forces that create these differences. We will focus on three pivotal
historical moments: the Renaissance (key literary figure Shakespeare; about
1600), Romanticism (key literary figure Wordsworth; about 1800); and modernity
(key literary figure: Chinua Achebe). Types of literary theory that we will
explore include: New Criticism, formalism, feminism, and cultural materialism.
Concurrent enrollment in ENGL 197 required.Texts: Shakespeare, Merchant of Venice; Chinua Achebe, Things
Fall Apart; photocopied
course packet.
207 A (Introduction to Cultural Studies)
M-Th 10:30
Mirpuri
anoop@u.washington.edu
Race, Prison, and the Cultural Politics of Crime. This course will begin with
the idea that “cultural studies” should be understood as a critical
practice of engaging with social phenomena, rather than an abstract scholarly
discipline. Thus, we will assume that to remove cultural studies from a specific
practical purpose would be to negate the value of its approach. While our primary
purpose will be to familiarize ourselves with cultural studies methodology,
this will be done by approaching a specific topic of inquiry, the urgency of
which will serve as an example of the value that cultural studies can bring
to socially and politically engaged analysis. Why is it that at the start of
the 21st century, the U.S. has imprisoned more people than any other nation
in the world? And why is it that most of those incarcerated are people of color,
and primarily African American? In the course of performing this inquiry, we
will ask what cultural studies is and from what intellectual traditions it
emerges? What is the “culture” in cultural studies? How do we “do” cultural
studies, and what is the value of this approach? The topical questions will
include: What is the role of prison in liberal democratic societies? What social
and cultural developments have made prisons a self-evident punishment in the
U.S.? How have we come to identify certain types of people with the commission
of certain types of crimes, and why are certain communities and crimes more
actively policed? What is the relation between the prison as a form of punishment,
and the concepts of freedom and equality that shape our political existence?
How as “culture” been a medium in which we have struggled over
the meanings of race, crime, and prison? How has our imagination of these become
central to the production of the social order in which we live today? Texts: Michel
Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth
of the Prison; Angela
Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete?; Franz Kafka, The Trial; Richard
Wright, Native
Son; Herman Melville, Bartleby and Benito Cereno.
211 A (Medieval and Renaissance Literature)
M-Th 1:30
Borlik
tandrew@u.washington.edu
Few words in the English language are as difficult to devine as “Art” and “Nature.” In
the Elizabethan era, to call a poem “artificial” was a compliment,
as readers delighted in the bravura display of human ingenuity. But did the
Renaissance exultation of “Man” and mankind’s creative prowess
entail a denigration of the natural world? Or could Art serve to embellish
Nature in order, as Sir Philip Sidney put it, “to make the too much loved
earth more lovely?” This course will focus on the interplay of Art and
Nature in some classic works of medieval and Renaissance literature: Chaucer’s
Parliament of Fowls, Sidney’s Arcadia, two plays by Shakespeare (As
You Like It and The Winter’s Tale), Bacon’s technological utopia, The
New Atlantis, and the poetry of Spenser, Milton, Marvell, and Pope. We will
sift the texts to uncover how attitudes toward aesthetics and the environment
differed in a pre-Industrial society. Moreover, we will trace the ways writers
responded to the growing religious and scientific justification for human dominion
over nature. Not only will the course historicize our current sense of an ecological
crisis, but allow us to debate the role of vital art in mediating our experience
of the natural world. Course website: http://staff.washington.edu/tandrew/artandnature.html Texts: Chaucer, Dream
Visions and Other Poems; Sidney, Sir
Philip Sidney (The Oxford Authors); Shakespeare, As You Like It; The
Winter’s
Tale; photocopied course pack.
212 A (Literature of Enlightenment & Revolution)
M-Th 8:30
Morgan
paigecm@u.washington.edu
This course begins with a study of the literature of the Enlightenment, also
known as the Age of Reason. The texts we read in the first half of the quarter
will show the development of comedic wit and satire, emphasize precision of
rhyme and meter, and demonstrate the importance of taste, and a focus on beauty,
and the idea of bringing light to the world. For the second half of the quarter,
we will focus on literature influenced by the French Revolution, and explore
the ways that the sparkling light and wit crumbles and changes with the tension
of the war in France, and the rise of Romanticism. Students may expect to read
poetry and prose by Dryden, Swift, Montagu, Pope, Gray, Cowper, Clare, Blake,
Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Percy Shelley, as well as excerpts from philosophers
such as Newton, Locke, Rousseau, and Burke. Readings for this class involve
a great deal of poetry which will require an intense amount of concentration
and a willingness not only to read, but to reread the assigned texts. Grading
will be based on class participation and written work, which will probably
involve a midterm and final exam, one essay (4-5 pages), short response papers,
and active participation in discussions in class or on an electronic message
board. Texts: Greenblatt, ed., Norton Anthology of English
Literature, Vol.
1C: The Restoration and Eighteenth Century; photocopied course packet.
213 A (Modern & Postmodern Literature)
M-Th 10:30
Buttler
tbuttler@u.washington.edu
Outright Gangsterism and Uncanny Encounters. There is an old fable of the Man
and the Lion where the lion complains that he will not be so misrepresented
when the lions “write history.” What has been suggested by public
intellectual Edward Said is that Western scholarship, particularly in the nineteenth
century, attempted to take what is not “understood” and domesticate
it or build archives that act to characterize it so as to reduce the perceived
threat of the inalienable. Western scholarship, or knowledge bases, have been
supported by the study of Western historians, scientists, novelists, painters,
media representations, Hollywood enchantments. Ultimately, the consequence
is that, by trying to “understand” the foreign, Westerners have
reduced unassimilable encounters and peoples to facile categories that become
originary assumptions on which further inquiry and representation is staged.
The same could be argued about representations of other categories such as
race, gender, class, or sexual orientation.
This course will offer the opportunity to read modern and contemporary novels, as well as essays of public intellectuals that engage theories of encounters. We will read short, expatriate novels by West Indies-born Jean Rhys, Indochina-born French author, screenwriters, and activist, Marguerite Duras, Iranian-born author, Shahnush Parsipur, Russian-born Brazilian Jew Clarice Lispector, and Japanese-born British author, Kazuo Ishiguro, to build on and complicate theoretical work on psychological and political motivations. These shifts in “accounting” arguably have the power to invite the reader to reevaluate his or her identifications with concepts like rationality, gender, race, nationality, home, the stranger, love, loss, and honor.
In addition to the novels, we will use excerpts from Andre Aciman’s Letters of Transit: Reflections on Exile, Identity, Language and Loss, Elly Bulkin, Minnie Bruce Pratt, and Barbara Smith’s “Identity: Skin, Blood, Heart,” from Yours in Struggle, Gopinath, Gayatri’s “Nostalgia, Desire, Diaspora: South Asian Sexualities in Motion,” from Impossible Desires, Edward Said’s Orientalism, and Reflections on Exile, Franz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, Susan Rubin Suleiman’s Exile and Creativity, and Minoo Moallen’s Between Warrior Brother and Veiled Sister: Islamic Fundamentalims and the Politics of Patriarch in Iran. Students should be prepared to read approximately 150 pages a week. Discussion will be at the heart of what we do, so come expecting lots of talk and lively differences of opinion. Texts: Duras, The Lover; Shahmuch Parsipur, Women Without Men (or other novel TBA); Andre Aciman, Letters of Transit: Reflections on Exile, Identity, Language and Loss; Kazuo Ishiguro, Remains of the Day; photocopied course packet.
225 A (Shakespeare)
M-Th 8:30
Rygh
(W)
trygh@u.washington.edu
In this introductory Shakespeare course we will read a representative survey
of his tragedies, comedies, history plays and imaginative romances – with
as many sonnets as we can find time for in class. Our focus will be the history
of “Shakespeare’s” performances from the composition and
production of the works in the context of Elizabethan / Jacobean England through
to its cinematic interpretations of Olivier, Branagh, and Zeferelli. Texts: Bevington, ed., The
Complete Works of Shakesepeare; Garber, Shakespeare After
All.
228 A (English Literary Culture: To 1600)
M-Th 9:30
Centerwall
bcenter@u.washington.edu
Becoming English. The Anglo-Saxons who conquered Celtic Britain in
the 400s-600s CE were not at all “English.” They were Germanic
tribes led by Germanic warlords, a people with a complex, rich literature of
their own, but
a literature that was not an “English” literature. How did they
become “English”? And how is this transformation made evident in
their works? After reading Beowulf, we will consider that black hole in our
literature, the 300 years following the Norman Conquest – William the
Conqueror, 1066, and all that – when the language of literature in England
was French! Usually ignored in English literature courses, these masterpieces
in Old French have until recently been regarded as “not English,” yet
it was from between the hammer and anvil of Anglo-Saxon and French that there
emerged what we think of today as “English literature.” The seed
planted by the King Arthur mythos germinates in Chaucer to reach its full growth
in Shakespeare. (INSTRUCTOR'S NOTE about Shakespeare texts: We
will be reading three plays by Shakespeare. If you already own or have access
to
an
edition
of the
complete
works of Shakespeare,
please feel free to use it. If you purchase new individual softcover editions
ordered for each of these plays, it will cost you a total of $33 plus tax.
In contrast, the recommended hardcover edition of the complete
works (The Norton Shakespeare) will cost you $65 plus tax. It's a matter
of personal judgment, but the
purchase of the complete Shakespeare in hardcover may well be a better long-term
investment
than purchasing plays one at a time in softcover.) Texts: Seamus
Heaney, tr., Beowulf:
A New Verse Translation;
Robert W. Hanning, tr., The Lais of Marie de France; Geoffrey Chaucer, The
Canterbury Tales (tr.
Wright); Love Visions; Shakespeare, Henry IV, Part 1; Henry IV,
Part 2; Henry V; OR The Norton Shakespeare.
229 A (English Literary Culture: 1600-1800)
M-Th 2:30
Rubasky
erubasky@u.washington.edu
In this section of ENGL 229 we will focus on covering as much representative
literature from the time of 1600 to 1800 as is reasonable in one quarter, beginning
with Shakespeare’s The Tempest, and ending with Wordsworth and Coleridge’s
Lyrical Ballads. While the literature of this period is wide-ranging, we will
help to focus our study by looking at how the traditions of the epic and the
ballad inform the authors of this period. Many of the authors of this time
consciously evoke the traditions of these long enduring literary forms in order
to lend authority to their works, but also because these literary traditions
are inextricably related to ideas of nationhood, aesthetics, and history. The
authors for the course will include, but not be limited to, Shakespeare, Milton,
Marvell, Dryden, Swift, Pope, Johnson, Wortley Montague, Gray, Blake, Wordsworth
and Coleridge. Texts: Norton Anthology of English Literature, 8th ed., Vol.
I: The Middle Ages through the Restoration and the 18th Century; Shakespeare,
The Tempest (Norton Critical Edition).
242 A (Reading Fiction)
M-Th 8:30
Schenold
(W)
schenold@u.washington.edu
Prism, Mirror, Lens: The Novel and Reflection. Our contemporary moment seems
to present us with a problem for imaginative reflection. Reflecting on the
prospects of postmodern morality, the philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard wrote: “Today,
life is fast. It vaporizes morals. Futility suits the postmodern, for words
as well as things. But that doesn’t keep us from asking questions: how
to live and why? The answers are deferred.” If, as Lyotard suggests,
we are constantly compelled by our everyday life to act in a kind of hyper-pragmatic
mode where reflection (about morality, life, or otherwise) appears a futile
endeavor, what might the tale of the novel be, considered as a special (even
unique) form of reflection in creating a new space for thought?
This course will take students to four compelling monuments of English literature that present extraordinary occasions for reflection, starting with the hyper-reflective fiction of Tristram Shandy (1759) and ending with the more ergodic “faction” of House of Leaves (2000). We will consider these novels not only as cultural artifacts which exemplify interesting (and possibly critical) aesthetic and moral perspectives, but as living sites of reflection which shape, challenge, and exercise our imagination in creative and culturally important ways. Although the novels represent an historical sequence, the emphasis in our discussions and reflections will be on what and how they ask us to imagine, and what significant judgments they contain which afford us a better understanding of ourselves and our own situation.
This course will include some very short lectures for context, but the majority of the course will be guided discussion and sharing of commentary. Students are asked to (1) participate actively in class discussions (which means offering insights, proposing questions, raising issues, etc.); (2) produce periodic critical commentaries in a personal reading blog (which will be public); (3) complete a multiple choice/short-answer midterm exam, and (4) write an 8-10 page paper on one of the novels of your choosing. The reading load works out to roughly 200 pages a week (not a Herculean task, but surely an intense one), and students can expect to produce roughly two single-spaced pages of eommentary a week. Texts: Laurence Sterne, The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman; Herman Melville, Moby Dick; Virginia Woolf, The Waves; Mark Danielewski, House of Leaves; photocopied course packet containing a few short stories and some essays.
242 B (Reading Fiction)
M-Th 9:30
Mondal
(W)
sharleen@u.washington.edu
Reading Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. The official university catalog
description for ENGL 242 reads as follows: “Critical interpretation and
meaning in fiction. Different examples of fiction representing a variety of
types from the medieval to modern periods.” The latter part of the description
is somewhat misleading, as it is impossible to cover literature “from
the medieval to modern periods” in any fair sense in one course, much
less in one quarter. Furthermore, because “critical interpretation” of
fiction requires an understanding of historical, social, political, and cultural
context of the work, we must necessarily narrow our inquiry to literature which
shares a reasonably common context. In this class, we will read nineteenth-century
British literature, paying special attention to a variety of forms and contexts
shaping the assigned fiction. We will explore essays, novels, poems, novellas,
and one film adaptation, thus considering genre and form as we practice strategies
for careful literary analysis. The central thematic concern of the course will
be to examine how fiction, as cultural production, actively contests, negotiates,
and/or perpetuates (rather than simply passively representing) issues of class,
gender, race, sexuality, national identity, and empire at particular historical
moments. There will be a mid-term examination, a final paper (approximately
8 pages), scheduled reading quizzes each week, one presentation on relevant
contextual material, one day on which to lead discussion, and required participation
in class discussion. I will rarely lecture; students should come prepared to
discuss the reading and to contribute their insights and ideas to class conversation.
Texts include: excerpts from Thomas Carlyle’s Past and Present and from
his Án Occasional Discourse on the Nigger Question”; excerpts
from Friedrich Engels’ “The Great Towns”; Charles Dickens’ Hard
Times; John Stuart Mill’s “What is Poetry?{ and excerpts from his
On Liberty and The Subjection of Women; Christina Rossetti’s “Goblin
Market,” Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s “Jenny,” excerpts
from Matthew Arnold’s Culture and Anarchy; George Eliot’s Middlemarch,
and an excerpt from her “Silly Novels By Lady Novelists”; Robert
Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde; and Rudyard
Kipling’s The Man Who Would Be King. We will also watch John Huston’s
film adaptation of this novella. Texts: The Norton Anthology
of English Literature, 8th ed, Volume E: The Victorian Age; Charles Dickens, Hard
Times; R. L. Stevenson,
The Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde; George Eliot, Middlemarch; photocopied course packet.
242 C (Reading Fiction)
M-Th 10:30
Vechinski
(W)
mjvechin@u.washington.edu
The Value of Fiction in British Modernism. During the Modernist
period, British critics, many of whom happened to be authors of fiction themselves,
rethought
the aims of fiction which were until that point largely unexamined in a systematic
way. These critics performed the necessary task of justifying experimentation
in fiction as British authors broke from the dominant assumptions underlying
nineteenth-century literary realism. They pointed out how some innovations
in the form and content of fiction remained consistent with previous ideals
such as verisimilitude and social relevance, but authors opted for different
means of achieving them. Critics and authors also strove to persuade readers
to find new value in fiction by fostering an appreciation of ambiguity, difficult,
and psychology. This course will place special emphasis on how these revised
notions of value were articulated an dhow they gradually gained wide acceptance.
Today we no longer regard the majority of British Modernist fiction to be particularly
radical, which suggests that we have come to acknowledge and often share their
attitudes to fiction, and perhaps even that the value we find in fiction remains
essentially unchanged despite literary trends.
Students in the course will analyze essays that deal with the value of fiction and pair them with their readings of novels and short stories written by British authors between 1890 and 1950. The arguments they write will center on the means and ends of fiction as described or implied in Modernist texts, not the qualitative evaluation of individual works, critical ideas or authors or values plural in the moral or religious sense. The course will focus on four stages of British Modernist fiction: late realism (or naturalism), literary impressionism, psychological realism, and the novel no longer novel (Malcolm Bradbury’s characterization of post-World War II British fiction). Texts: Ford Madox Ford, The Good Soldier; Virginia Woolf, The Waves; Iris Murdoch, Under the Net; photocopied course pack (available at Ave Copy) including short stories by Henry James, Katherine Mansfield, Jean Rhys, James Joyce, and Samuel Beckett, and criticism by Henry James, Joseph Conrad, and Rebecca West, as well as a few examples of more recent scholarship in Modernist fiction.
242 D (Reading Fiction)
M-Th 11:30
Levay
(W)
levaymt@u.washington.edu
Crime and Modern Fiction. This course will examine the representation
of crime, criminality, and deviance in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century
British
and American fiction, focusing especially on the unique changes in popular
perceptions of criminal behavior during the transition from the Victorian to
the modernist period. As a result of this dual literary and historical focus,
our work will not only involve the close reading of novels and short stories,
but also demand that we grapple with early scientific tracts on criminology,
journalistic accounts of crime and violence during the period in question,
and contemporary critical and theoretical essays on literature and crime. Our
course will begin with a look at the origins of detective fiction, exploring
the ways in which two of the nineteenth century’s most celebrated literary
detectives – Edgar Allan Poe’s C. Auguste Dupin and Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes – reflect on and respond to some
of the most preeminent social, scientific, and philosophical debates of the
age. From there we will turn to the representation of terrorism in the modern
novel, and then proceed to the genre of crime fiction, analyzing the various
methods, both conventional and experimental, by which authors attempted to
create a genre that was both believable in its depiction of criminal behavior
and motivation and sufficiently provocative to appeal to a mass audience. The
course will conclude with a few mid-century novels dealing with the subject
of murder and we’ll ask ourselves what, if anything, has changed in popular
accounts of murder and murderers in subsequent years. Texts: Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle, The Sign of Four; Joseph Conrad, The Secret
Agent, Dorothy Sayers, Whose
Body?; Graham Greene, Brighton Rock; Patricia
Highsmith, The Talented Mr. Ripley; photocopied course packet of historical
materials and critical essays.
242 E (Reading Fiction)
M-Th 12:30
Griesbach
(W)
dgries@u.washington.edu
Myths, History, and Fiction. This course introduces the practice of
critically reading works of fiction. To do this, we will look at examples of
American
novels that are especially sensitive to their own status “modern” narratives
and that register a sense of dislocation from the past and from narrative forms
of some earlier period. We start by honing our understanding of “fiction” in
general by reading several explanations of the words “myth,” “history,” and “fiction.” We
will then inquire into such questions as: what are the possible roles of heroes,
legends, and folktales in a novel? How do we understand the presence of absence
of the details of history in fictional narratives? How can novels reorient
a reader’s sense of history and cultural myths? . Texts: Americo
Paredes, George Washington Gomez; John Steinbeck, Cannery
Row;
Sarah Orne Jewett, The Country of the Pointed Firs and Other Stories;
Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court; photocopied
course packet including some shorter reading selections and secondary materials
.
242 F (Reading Fiction)
M-Th 1:30
Miller
(W)
meganm6@u.washington.edu
Dirt Road Modernism. Literary modernism is typically associated
with urban experience in the first half of the twentieth century, and opposed
to the provincial
sensibilities of the nineteenth century. Many modernist texts respond to
life in big cities, examining the influence of consumer culture and advertising,
new modes of transportation, and the sensory experience of living in close
proximity to so many people. In this course, however, we will read fiction
that examines modern experience from outside the city. We will read four
main
works of fiction (two short-story cycles and two novels) from the 1920s and
1930s, Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio (1919), Jean Toomer’s Cane (1923),
Willa Cather’s The Professor’s House (1925),
and William Faulkner’s Light in August (1932). These texts
share modernist traits with their urban counterparts, and they also highlight
the broader effects
of modernization, including uneven development, rootlessness, and contact
with people who challenge a stable understanding of modern experience. The
goals
of the course will be (A) to familiarize you with some of the contextual
and formal issues central to the study of these texts, (B) to help you develop
and improve your close-reading skills, and (C) to help you improve your ability
to write about literature. Student Responsibilities: daily
attendance and active participation, careful reading and critical thinking,
class presentations,
plus two essays and a final revision. Texts: Toomer, Cane;
Faulkner, Light in August; Anderson, Winesburg,
Ohio;
Cather, The Professor’s House; photocopied coruse packet.
250 A (Introduction to American Literature)
M-Th 8:30
Lillis
lillisj@u.washington.edu
In this course we will trace representations of laboring bodies and commodities
as they are framed in shifting realms of production and consumption in American
literature from the mid 19th century to the present. We will read these representations
against the backdrop of broad historical transformations such as industrialization,
the emergence of a national market economy, and the proliferation of those circuits
of exchange we call “globalization.” Questions of how value is produced
and how characters embody desires will help focus our readings. This is not a
lecture class, so students must come prepared to engage in class discussions.
To ensure that everyone keeps up with the readings, I will administer a quiz
each day. Other course requirements include: delivering a presentation on a published
article of literary criticism, writing a 4-5 page mid-term paper, and writing
an 8-10 page final paper. Texts: (selections from) Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle
Tom’s Cabin; William Dean Howells, The Rise of Silas Lapham; Theodore Dreiser,
Sister Carrie; Upton Sinclair, The Jungle; Arthur Miller, Death
of a Salesman;
Toni Morrison, The Bluest Eye; Ruth Ozeki, My Year of Meats.
250 B (Introduction to American Literature)
M-Th 9:30
McKinney
karamck@u.washington.edu
As an introduction to American literature, this course will explore some of the
ways in which literary representations have addressed “America” as
a physical space, a bounded place, a sentiment, a fiction, an identity. By reading
texts from the revolutionary period to more contemporary times, we will trace
how the nation and national identities have been produced, with an emphasis on
representations of race, gender, class and sexuality. In what ways does literature
reproduce, puzzle and/or reject the shifting terms of national belonging? How
have authors made meaning out of “the American experience” and its
historical trajectories? Course work will include a demanding reading schedule,
participation in class discussions, response papers and quizzes, group presentations
and a final project. Texts: Herman Melville, Benito Cereno; Anita Loos, Gentlemen
Prefer Blondes; Nella Larsen, Passing, Ana Castillo, So Far
From God; photocopied
course packet
containing related materials and shorter works by authors such as Nathaniel Hawthorne,
W. E. B. DuBois, Henry James, Charles Chesnutt, Sui Sin Far, Sherwood Anderson,
Allen Ginsberg, Sherman Alexie, and Bobbie Ann Mason.
250 C (Introduction to American Literature)
M-Th 1:30
Barr
slb8@u.washington.edu
Beyond the Pale: Marginal Lives in American Literature. The late Joe Strummer
once asserted “the truth is only known . . . by . . . gutter-snipes.” While
he was thinking in terms of a heavily class-divided 1970s England, we might apply
his insight more broadly and ask the question: Do the voices of individuals who
are, for whatever reason, “beyond the pale” of mainstream American
experience, offer the willing ear a perspective uniquely attuned to differences
of race, class, geography, and gender? Drawing from an eclectic selection of
American short stories and novels, we will pursue this and other questions, such
as: What are the consequences, both psychic and social, of pointed exclusion
from the community? Is “individuality,” vis-à-vis the larger
society, uniquely problematized and performed in America? In what sense is affluence
a bane as well as a blessing? Can one experience exile without leaving “home”?
Why do some viewpoints circulate vigorously while others go unheard? Other substantial
questions will surely arise as we read and discuss the materials at hand. We
will consider all such questions in their historical and cultural contexts. Critical
perspectives from outside of our classroom will serve as crucial provocations
to our own thinking and ongoing inquiries. Be advised that this is not a lecture
class: most of our time and energy will be expended on open discussion and on
the importation and exchange of ideas. Requirements: Punctual reading, unwavering
attendance, engagement with class discussion, weekly quizzes, a mid-term paper,
group presentations, a final paper. Texts (required): Joan Didion, Play
It As
It Lays; Cormac McCarthy, Child of God; Toni Morrison, The
Bluest Eye; Hunter
S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in
Las Vegas; Dorothy Allison, Two or Three Things I Know for Sure; photocopied
course packet of supporting materials and short stories (available at Ave Copy
Shop, 4141 University); other materials to be distributed in class; recommended:MLA handbook; college-level dictionary
258 A (African-American Literature 1745-Present)
MW 11:30-1:20
Saloy
saloy1@u.washington.edu
This survey of African American Studies will attempt to cover a broad sweep
of the intellectual thought and literature, with attention to folk traditions,
from its beginnings in Africa, the oral tradition there and in America, as
documented in the slave narratives, through the major historical periods, including
the Harlem Renaissance, the Beat era, the Black Arts Movement to the end of
the twentieth century, with some consideration of the study as it is evolving
today. Guided by significant historical and cultural events and the intellectual
tradition in non-fiction prose, the goal is to gain an overview of the rich
semantic tradition of Blacks in America in various literary genres, folk traditions,
cultural and political movements, with attention to the aesthetic and ideological
concerns throughout Black American literature and its origins in experience.
Course activities will include reading the intellectual tradition and creative
literature, viewing films, listening to music, viewing visual art, with lectures,
class discussion, critical reviews. There will be some traditional quizzes,
non-traditional quizzes, one individual research paper, and one group research
presentation with non-traditional mid-term and final exam. Offered: jointly
with AFRAM 214. Texts: Gaines, Lesson Before Dying; Gates, Classic
Slave Narratives;
Hill, Call and Response.
264 A (Literature and Science)
MW 1:30-3:20
Wallace
moewalla@u.washington.edu
The Human and Its Others. Perhaps no category of identity seems as
self-evident as the “human.” However, as Diana Fuss has argued,
the human—at
least as we know it—is in fact “a linguistic, cultural, and sociopolitical
construct of comparatively recent date.” Taking Fuss’s counterintuitive
suggestion as a starting point, this course will consider “the human” as
a historical category by looking at figures in literature and science that
have been on, and consequently troubled, its borders. Along the way we will
meet such memorable characters as Shelley’s “miserable creature”;
Wells’s Morlocks and Elois; and sociobiologist Richard Dawkins’s
selfish gene. We will encounter Franz Kafka’s imagined talking ape and
the real-life psychologist Winthrop Kellogg, who raised his son Donald alongside
a chimpanzee named Gua. And we will explore the figure of the scientist him
or herself, a character variously described as human, superhuman, or inhuman,
depending on the text. Throughout we will ask: How do novelists respond to
scientific innovation? How do scientists employ “literary” language
like metaphor and symbol in describing their theories? What kind of “human” has
been imagined in literature and science? And how has this seemingly abstract
category been filled in with other categories of identity? Texts: Mary
Shelley,
Frankenstein; H.G. Wells, The Time Machine; Charlotte Perkins
Gilman, Herland;
Kurt Vonnegut, Galapagos; Octavia Butler, Lilith’s Brood;
Margaret Atwood,
Oryx and Crake; photocopied course packet.
281 A (Intermediate Expository Writing)
MW 8:30-10:20
Stuart
cdds@u.washington.edu
It is important to realize that English 281 is an intermediate expository writing
course: you are expected to arrive having thought about and practiced academic
writing in a variety of settings. Depending on your strengths, you may need to
seek extra help from me and/or writing centers on campus, and I strongly encourage
everyone to visit me in office hours to discuss any questions you have. Please
keep in mind that I’m here to help and would like to see you do well in
this course. This class will foster a better understanding of writing, as well
as many opportunities to write, by first examining what a text is, how discourse
shapes
and is shaped by text, and how texts and discourse work to create rhetorical
situations. This class imagines that rhetorical awareness and understanding
can be fostered by examining real world, everyday texts and by producing both
traditional and innovative arguments about them. Our examination will thus
take us from the traditional notion of text as something written down to the
innovative and perhaps unexpected idea of texts as images, pictures, symbols,
and even film. In some sense, the rhetorical awareness gained by investigating
and producing a variety of rhetorical texts may actually be more transferable
to the work you perform in your different disciplines than would be an approach
that imagines a single “academic essay” exists in the university.
Because you come from different backgrounds and have different goals for your
college career and your professional career once you earn your degrees, it
is important to realize how texts and discourse function differently and take
different rhetorical (and literal) shapes in different disciplines. In the
second half of the course, then, we will bridge our emerging general understanding
of text, discourse, and rhetoric with a more focused examination of the role
texts play in specific academic and professional situations. In other words,
the main goal of this course is to be as practical as possible: I want you
to investigate, analyze, and ultimately learn to write the way people do in
your major, discipline, and (potential) field of interest. Text: photocopied
course packet.
281 B (Intermediate Expository Writing)
MW 12:30-2:20
Cabral
cathrync@u.washington.edu
Alternative Discourses in Academic Argumentation. This 281 course focuses on
academic discourse and alternative academic discourses as they compete for and
share space within the academy. We will begin by exploring some of the conventions
of academic discourse and the implications of these conventions. What types of
arguments and voices does academic discourse allow for; what does it obscure
and prevent (both overtly and implicitly); who does it privilege; who does it
disenfranchise? Following this discussion, we will then read a number of alternative
texts that attempt to explode or re-imagine some of these conventions—multiple
language use, blurring of genres, questioning the position of the author in the
text, the organization of argument, etc. We will question whether or not these
are “academic” arguments, and subject these discourses to the same
scrutiny we did academic discourse. What arguments and voices do alternative
discourses allow for and not allow for? Your previous writing experiences (both
in and outside the academy) will provide the foundation for working toward an
understanding and exploration of both discourses. Throughout the quarter, you
will analyze and produce a number of traditional academic essays as well as alternative
texts that respond to the ideas we will be exploring in class. The skills you
will develop in this course should enable you to engage more critically and effectively
as writers within and outside of the university. Texts: Lisa Kanae, Sister Tongue; Cherrie Moraga, Loving
in the War Years;
Patricia Williams, Alchemy of Race and Rights.
281 C (Intermediate Expository Writing)
TTh 8:30-10:20
Oenbring
oenbrr@u.washington.edu
Genre and the Northwest. ENGL 281, the second class in the UW’s expository
writing stream, is meant to help you sharpen the skills you acquired in your
freshman writing course: academic writing and critical reading. My goals for
the class are as follows: to develop your awareness of the goals and assumptions
of particular writing styles (what we will call genres); and to recognize that
particular writing situations require specific persuasive moves. That is to
say, writers need to become familiar with the codes that govern writing in
their area of the university, their discipline. You need to know about disciplinarity
because, as a student who writes, you must be able to adapt your writing style,
not only to the surface forms, but also to the codes, beliefs, and meanings
that make up your discipline.
To find our bearings in our exploration of the notion of writing genres, we will investigate how various types of writing differentially construe peoples and objects in the Northwest. While most of the styles of writing that we will look at are found other places as well as just in the Northwest, our limiting of the scope of our exploration to texts about peoples and objects in the Northwest will provide us with a shared point of reference for entering the notion of genre, a very abstract and fluid concept. While we will read some creative works, most of the texts we will read will be of the non-fiction variety; this course is not a “literary genres of the Northweest” class. The texts we will read will include the following: native narratives, anthropological tracts, scholarly work in the social and physical sciences, journalism, and a novel. The ultimate goal of the course is to get you writing, and you will be doing plenty of it. Expect to write three short papers of approximately three pages apiece and two longer six-page papers. Texts: David Guterson, Snow Falling on Cedars; photocopied course packet.
283 A (Beginning Verse Writing)
MW 1:30-2:50
Seong
arnie@u.washington.edu
As a culture, we tend to think of poems as spontaneous effusions, communicated
to us by a muse. And though the muse has come to take many different guises — experience,
culture, emotion, neurological short-circuit — this conception of the poem is
still rather mystical and mystified, and, at best, only partially true. The focus
of this course is the missing X of the equation: the tempering of the muse’s
raw material with discipline. The goal is to provide students with a basic toolkit
of poetic devices and techniques, an understanding of how to employ these metaphorical
wrenches and sonic skill saws (among other things) more effectively, and to pour
a concrete foundation for future reading and writing. Majors only, Registration
Period 1; sophomores, juniors only, Registration Period 1.
283 B (Beginning Verse Writing)
TTh 9:30-10:50
Rabb
rabbm@u.washington.edu
We’ll concentrate each week on a particular aspect of poetry, with readings
and discussions to explore that topic followed by a workshop of student work
inspired by particular technical and artistic considerations. Substantial reading,
writing, revision and memorization are all essential elements of the process.
Students will produce portfolios of their own revised work, along with reflective
essays on their peers’ writing. Majors only, Registration Period 1; sophomores,
juniors only, Registration Period 1.
Text: photocopied course packet.
284 A (Beginning Short Story Writing)
MW 2:30-3:50
Porter
ewporter@u.washington.edu
This class will serve as an introduction to the basic elements of the art of
short fiction. Through the reading of previously written works and the creation
of our own narratives, we will explore such fundamental topics as plot, character,
setting, dialogue, theme, metaphor, image, and point of view. We will use small
group workshops to illuminate the relationship between readers and writers: what
are the responsibilities that each has to the other? Through workshopping, we
will also ask questions of our stories and explore possibilities for future revision.
Course website: http://courses.washington.edu/engl284/ Majors
only, Registration
Period
1;
sophomores,
juniors
only,
Registration
Period
1.
284 B (Beginning Short Story Writing)
TTh 9:30-10:50
Steere
jsteere@u.washington.edu
By the end of this course, students should have a better understanding of what
defines a great contemporary short story and how to craft their own work. While
the class will contain discussions about the typical elements of fiction (plot,
character, setting, etc.) the real emphasis will be on equipping students with
a process for exploring and creating stories on their own. In approaching fiction,
perhaps for the first time, students have a fresh perspective on the generative
process, and as such will be able to benefit from thinking about the roots from
which great prose arises. This course will be held in a class-wide workshop format.
Students will submit work to be reviewed by other students and the professor
after which the class will discuss the author's work and make suggestions for
its improvement. We will also be discussing published stories by professional
writers and excerpts from Robert Olen Butler's book on writing "From Where
You Dream." The class may also venture outside the classroom to write from
experiences in art galleries and natural areas.
The best thing a student can do in order to prepare for this course is read. Familiarizing yourself with modern literary fiction will help you understand the expectations for how to create your own stories. Magazines that publish short fiction include "The New Yorker," "Atlantic Monthly," "Harper's," etc. Prominent anthologies of contemporary authors include "The Best American Short Stories," "Best New American Voices," and many others that are readily available in almost any bookstore. As always, studying the classic works of authors like Ernest Hemingway, James Joyce, Virginia Wolff, Alice Munro, etc. will surely help as well.
Students will be writing two stories over the course of the quarter and revising
one of them. A presentation on one of the stories in the required fiction anthology
will also be required. In addition, in-class writing activities, exercises,
and responses to other students' stories will also be considered part of the
body of work students should produce by the end of the quarter. Evaluation
will consist of a response to the written stories, the presentation, and class
participation. Course website: http://coruses.washington.edu/engl284. Majors
only, Registration Period 1; sophomores, juniors only, Registration Period
1. Texts: .Nicholas Delbanco, ed., The Sincerest Form:
Writing Fiction by Imitation;
Robert Olen Butler, From Where You Dream (ed. Burroway).